Rossion Bruno, Caharel Stéphanie
Institute of Psychology, Institute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, Belgium.
Vision Res. 2011 Jun 21;51(12):1297-311. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.04.003. Epub 2011 Apr 28.
How fast are visual stimuli categorized as faces by the human brain? Because of their high temporal resolution and the possibility to record simultaneously from the whole brain, electromagnetic scalp measurements should be the ideal method to clarify this issue. However, this question remains debated, with studies reporting face-sensitive responses varying from 50 ms to 200 ms following stimulus onset. Here we disentangle the contribution of the information associated with the phenomenological experience of a face (phase) from low-level visual cues (amplitude spectrum, color) in accounting for early face-sensitivity in the human brain. Pictures of faces and of a category of familiar objects (cars), as well as their phase-scrambled versions, were presented to fifteen human participants tested with high-density (128 channels) EEG. We replicated an early face-sensitivity - larger response to pictures of faces than cars - at the level of the occipital event-related potential (ERP) P1 (80- ). However, a similar larger P1 to phase-scrambled faces than phase-scrambled cars was also found. In contrast, the occipito-temporal N170 was much larger in amplitude for pictures of intact faces than cars, especially in the right hemisphere, while the small N170 elicited by phase-scrambled stimuli did not differ for faces and cars. These findings show that sensitivity to faces on the visual evoked potentials P1 and N1 (N170) is functionally dissociated: the P1 face-sensitivity is driven by low-level visual cues while the N1 (or N170) face-sensitivity reflects the perception of a face. Altogether, these observations indicate that the earliest access to a high-level face representation, that is, a face percept, does not precede the N170 onset in the human brain. Furthermore, they allow resolving apparent discrepancies between the timing of rapid human saccades towards faces and the early activation of high-level facial representations as shown by electrophysiological studies in the primate brain. More generally, they put strong constraints on the interpretation of early (before 100 ms) face-sensitive effects in the human brain.
人类大脑将视觉刺激归类为面部的速度有多快?由于其高时间分辨率以及能够同时从全脑进行记录,头皮电磁测量应该是阐明这个问题的理想方法。然而,这个问题仍存在争议,研究报告称刺激开始后50毫秒到200毫秒之间都存在对面部敏感的反应。在这里,我们在解释人类大脑早期对面部的敏感性时,区分了与面部现象学体验(相位)相关的信息和低水平视觉线索(振幅谱、颜色)的贡献。向15名使用高密度(128通道)脑电图进行测试的人类参与者展示了面部图片和一类熟悉物体(汽车)的图片,以及它们的相位打乱版本。我们在枕叶事件相关电位(ERP)P1(80 - )水平上复制了早期对面部的敏感性——对面部图片的反应大于对汽车图片的反应。然而,我们还发现,与相位打乱的汽车相比,相位打乱的面部也会引发类似的更大的P1。相比之下,完整面部图片的枕颞N170振幅比汽车图片大得多,尤其是在右半球,而相位打乱刺激引发的小N170在面部和汽车之间没有差异。这些发现表明,视觉诱发电位P1和N1(N170)对面部的敏感性在功能上是分离的:P1对面部的敏感性由低水平视觉线索驱动,而N1(或N170)对面部的敏感性反映了对面部的感知。总之,这些观察结果表明,在人类大脑中,最早获得高级面部表征,即面部感知,不会早于N170开始。此外,它们有助于解决人类快速扫视面部的时间与灵长类大脑电生理研究所示的高级面部表征早期激活之间明显的差异。更普遍地说,它们对人类大脑中早期(100毫秒之前)对面部敏感效应的解释施加了严格限制。