Sno H N, Draaisma D
University Department of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Psychol Med. 1993 Feb;23(1):17-26. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700038812.
In 1904 and 1906, Heymans reported the results of two prospective questionnaire surveys on déjà vu experiences and depersonalization in a sample of mainly students. Déjà vu experiences appeared to be more frequent than episodes of depersonalization. Emotional sensitivity, unstable mood fluctuations, apathetic episodes and irregular working rhythm emerged as predisposing personality traits. With the exception of the working rhythm, these traits were more prominent among the respondents with episodes of depersonalization than among those with déjà vu experiences. Heymans inferred that these findings supported his hypothesis that déjà vu experiences and depersonalization both resulted from the diminishing or disappearance of a sense of familiarity due to a momentary reduction of psychological energy. A re-analysis of Heymans' data partly confirmed his findings and conclusions as to the predisposing factors. The authors conclude that his studies and his hypothesis have been hitherto undervalued and would deserve more attention.
1904年和1906年,海曼斯报告了两项前瞻性问卷调查的结果,调查对象主要是学生样本中的即视感体验和人格解体情况。即视感体验似乎比人格解体发作更为频繁。情绪敏感、情绪波动不稳定、冷漠发作和工作节奏不规律是易患人格特质。除工作节奏外,这些特质在有人格解体发作的受访者中比在即视感体验者中更为突出。海曼斯推断,这些发现支持了他的假设,即即视感体验和人格解体都是由于心理能量瞬间减少导致熟悉感减弱或消失所致。对海曼斯数据的重新分析部分证实了他关于易感因素的发现和结论。作者得出结论,他的研究和假设迄今未得到充分重视,值得更多关注。