Gschwend J, Miller K, Hautmann R
Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universität Ulm.
Urologe A. 1993 Mar;32(2):141-4.
Interdisciplinary use of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy with sonographic or fluoroscopic guidance has become a routine procedure in clinical practice, for both urolithiasis and cholecystolithiasis. Therefore, newly developed systems with combined locating devices are gaining in importance. A primary sonographically guided lithotripter was extended by a mobile X-ray system. The results were compared with those obtained with a first-generation lithotripter. The results show that sufficient disintegration of stones throughout the urinary tract is possible with both systems. The retreatment rate with both lithotripters was 30% when stone size was comparable. No essential differences in treatment time, shockwave energy and pain were found. The easy localisation of radiolucent stones, convenient positioning of the patient and successful localisation of ureteral stones near to the spine are advantages of the MPL 9000 X. On the other hand, the technically simpler fluoroscopy system and greater ease of electrode changing are advantages of the HM3 Lithotripter. Altogether, differences in the application of the two systems are slight and insignificant except in special cases.
在超声或荧光透视引导下跨学科使用体外冲击波碎石术已成为临床治疗尿路结石和胆囊结石的常规方法。因此,新开发的带有组合定位装置的系统正变得越来越重要。一台主要的超声引导碎石机通过一个移动X射线系统进行了扩展。将结果与第一代碎石机的结果进行了比较。结果表明,两种系统都能使整个尿路中的结石充分破碎。当结石大小相当时,两种碎石机的再次治疗率均为30%。在治疗时间、冲击波能量和疼痛方面未发现本质差异。MPL 9000 X的优点是能轻松定位透X线结石、方便患者定位以及成功定位靠近脊柱的输尿管结石。另一方面,HM3碎石机的优点是荧光透视系统技术上更简单且更换电极更容易。总体而言,除特殊情况外,两种系统在应用上的差异微小且不显著。