• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全科医疗中鼻窦炎的抗生素治疗。一项比较氧氟沙星和红霉素的双盲研究。

Antibiotic treatment of sinusitis in general practice. A double-blind study comparing ofloxacin and erythromycin.

作者信息

Husfeldt P, Egede F, Nielsen P B

机构信息

Svenborg Sygehus, Denmark.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1993;250 Suppl 1:S23-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02540113.

DOI:10.1007/BF02540113
PMID:8476582
Abstract

The present study compared ofloxacin and erythromycin in a double-blind study with parallel groups for clinical efficacy and the number and severity of adverse reactions in patients treated in general practice for acute or chronic sinusitis. All patients lived in medium-sized to large towns and rural districts in the northern and western parts of Sealand, Funen and eastern Jutland, Denmark. Three hundred and nineteen patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 280 were clinically evaluable. From this total number, 136 patients were treated with ofloxacin (31 males and 105 females) and 144 patients were treated with erythromycin (40 males and 104 females). Following administration of either ofloxacin 400 mg once daily or erythromycin 500 mg twice daily for 7-14 days, 94.9% of the ofloxacin-treated group and 94.4% of the erythromycin-treated group were cured of their infections. There was no difference in clinical efficacy. Complications occurred in 18 of 155 patients in the ofloxacin-treated group and 32 of 164 in the erythromycin-treated group (P < 0.05), corresponding to 27 and 45 symptoms respectively (P < 0.01). This difference in adverse reactions principally involved gastrointestinal symptoms, i.e. 19 in the ofloxacin-treated group and 41 in the erythromycin-treated group (P < 0.01). Present findings show that the two antibiotics are comparable as to clinical efficacy, but the frequency of adverse reactions is significantly higher in the erythromycin-treated group due to the greater incidence of gastrointestinal adverse reactions.

摘要

本研究在一项双盲平行组研究中,比较了氧氟沙星和红霉素对在普通诊所接受治疗的急性或慢性鼻窦炎患者的临床疗效以及不良反应的数量和严重程度。所有患者均居住在丹麦西兰岛北部和西部、菲英岛以及日德兰半岛东部的中型至大型城镇和农村地区。共有319名患者参与该研究,其中280名患者可进行临床评估。在这280名患者中,136名患者接受氧氟沙星治疗(31名男性,105名女性),144名患者接受红霉素治疗(40名男性,104名女性)。在每天一次服用400毫克氧氟沙星或每天两次服用500毫克红霉素,持续7 - 14天之后,氧氟沙星治疗组94.9%的患者和红霉素治疗组94.4%的患者感染得到治愈。临床疗效无差异。氧氟沙星治疗组155名患者中有18名出现并发症,红霉素治疗组164名患者中有32名出现并发症(P < 0.05),分别对应27种和45种症状(P < 0.01)。不良反应的这种差异主要涉及胃肠道症状,即氧氟沙星治疗组有19例,红霉素治疗组有41例(P < 0.01)。目前的研究结果表明,两种抗生素在临床疗效方面具有可比性,但由于胃肠道不良反应发生率较高,红霉素治疗组的不良反应发生率明显更高。

相似文献

1
Antibiotic treatment of sinusitis in general practice. A double-blind study comparing ofloxacin and erythromycin.全科医疗中鼻窦炎的抗生素治疗。一项比较氧氟沙星和红霉素的双盲研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1993;250 Suppl 1:S23-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02540113.
2
Treatment of nongonococcal urethritis: comparison of ofloxacin and erythromycin.
Sex Transm Dis. 1989 Jan-Mar;16(1):32-5. doi: 10.1097/00007435-198901000-00007.
3
Treatment of lower respiratory infections in outpatients with ofloxacin compared with erythromycin.
Drugs Exp Clin Res. 1991;17(5):253-7.
4
Occurrence of Ureaplasma urealyticus and Mycoplasma hominis in non-gonococcal urethritis before and after treatment in a double-blind trial of ofloxacin versus erythromycin.在氧氟沙星与红霉素双盲试验中,非淋菌性尿道炎患者治疗前后解脲脲原体和人型支原体的出现情况。
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1990;68:31-4.
5
Sparfloxacin vs ofloxacin in the treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, comparative study. Sparfloxacin Multicenter ABECB Study Group.司帕沙星与氧氟沙星治疗慢性支气管炎急性细菌感染加重期的多中心、双盲、随机对照研究。司帕沙星多中心ABECB研究组
Chest. 1998 Jul;114(1):120-30. doi: 10.1378/chest.114.1.120.
6
Efficacy and safety of oral levofloxacin compared with clarithromycin in the treatment of acute sinusitis in adults: a multicentre, double-blind, randomized study. The Canadian Sinusitis Study Group.口服左氧氟沙星与克拉霉素治疗成人急性鼻窦炎的疗效与安全性:一项多中心、双盲、随机研究。加拿大鼻窦炎研究组
J Int Med Res. 1998 Dec;26(6):281-91. doi: 10.1177/030006059802600602.
7
A multicenter, investigator-blinded, randomized comparison of oral levofloxacin and oral clarithromycin in the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis.
Pharmacotherapy. 1998 Nov-Dec;18(6):1255-63.
8
Cefdinir versus levofloxacin in patients with acute rhinosinusitis of presumed bacterial etiology: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study.头孢地尼与左氧氟沙星治疗疑似细菌性病因的急性鼻-鼻窦炎患者的多中心、随机、双盲研究。
Clin Ther. 2004 Dec;26(12):2026-33. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.12.004.
9
Perioperative ofloxacin vs. tobramycin: efficacy in external ocular adnexal sterilization and anterior chamber penetration.围手术期氧氟沙星与妥布霉素对比:对外眼附属器消毒及前房穿透的疗效
Can J Ophthalmol. 1995 Feb;30(1):11-20.
10
Effectiveness and safety of ofloxacin in chronic otitis media and chronic sinusitis in adult outpatients.氧氟沙星对成年门诊患者慢性中耳炎和慢性鼻窦炎的有效性与安全性。 需注意,原英文文本中“of ofloxacin”表述有误,多了一个“of” 。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1993;250 Suppl 1:S13-4. doi: 10.1007/BF02540110.

引用本文的文献

1
The difference in pathogenic bacteria between chronic rhinosinusitis in patients with and without Sjogren's syndrome: a retrospective case-control study.干燥综合征患者与非干燥综合征患者慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的病原菌差异:一项回顾性病例对照研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Aug 2;22(1):666. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07652-4.
2
Systemic and topical antibiotics for chronic rhinosinusitis.用于慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的全身及局部用抗生素
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 26;4(4):CD011994. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011994.pub2.
3
Economic evaluation of antibacterials in the treatment of acute sinusitis.

本文引用的文献

1
Antibiotic susceptibility and phage-type pattern of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from patients in general practice compared to strains from hospitalized patients.与住院患者分离株相比,全科医疗中从患者分离的金黄色葡萄球菌菌株的抗生素敏感性和噬菌体分型模式。
Scand J Infect Dis. 1990;22(3):315-20. doi: 10.3109/00365549009027053.
2
Intracranial complications of paranasal sinusitis: a combined institutional review.鼻窦炎的颅内并发症:一项多机构联合综述
Laryngoscope. 1991 Mar;101(3):234-9. doi: 10.1288/00005537-199103000-00003.
3
[Treatment of sinusitis in general practice. A controlled investigation of pivampicillin (Pondocillin)].
抗菌药物治疗急性鼻窦炎的经济学评价
Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 Jan;15(1):97-113. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199915010-00007.
4
Efficacy and safety of azithromycin versus phenoxymethylpenicillin in the treatment of acute maxillary sinusitis.阿奇霉素与青霉素V钾治疗急性上颌窦炎的疗效及安全性比较
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996 Nov;15(11):849-53. doi: 10.1007/BF01691214.
[全科医疗中鼻窦炎的治疗。匹氨西林(潘多西林)的对照研究]
Ugeskr Laeger. 1978 Nov 6;140(45):2792-5.