• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CHOP方案与MEVP方案(米托蒽醌、依托泊苷、长春地辛、泼尼松龙)治疗中高度非霍奇金淋巴瘤的比较研究:一项前瞻性随机研究。

A comparative study of CHOP versus MEVP (mitoxantrone, etoposide, vindesine, prednisolone) therapy for intermediate-grade and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a prospective randomized study.

作者信息

Takagi T, Sampi K, Sawada U, Sakai C, Oguro M

机构信息

Hematology-Chemotherapy Division, Chiba Cancer Center Hospital, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Hematol. 1993 Jan;57(1):67-71.

PMID:8477064
Abstract

To evaluate a new combination chemotherapy with mitoxantrone (MXT), etoposide (VP-16), vindesine (VDS), and prednisolone (MEVP therapy) as a front-line chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), a prospective randomized study comparing this therapy (28 patients) with CHOP therapy (29 patients) was conducted in 57 patients with intermediate-grade or high-grade NHL with stages II-IV. The MEVP therapy consisted of 10 mg/m2 of MXT intravenously on day 1, 2 mg/m2 of VDS intravenously on day 1, 200 mg/m2 of VP-16 orally on days 1-3, and 40 mg/m2 of prednisolone orally on days 1-5. This regimen was repeated every 3 weeks for up to 10 courses. Complete responses (CR) were achieved in 17 (63.0%) of the 27 evaluable patients treated with MEVP therapy, and in 20 (71.4%) of the 28 evaluable patients treated with CHOP therapy. Relapse-free survival rates and overall survival rates at 3 years were 58.8% and 46.4%, respectively, for the MEVP group and 70.0% and 54.0%, respectively, for the CHOP group. Granulocytopenia was more severer and associated infection episodes were more frequent in the MEVP group. MEVP therapy was effective as a front-line chemotherapy for intermediate- and high-grade NHL, although it was not superior to CHOP therapy in treatment effect and was not less toxic than CHOP.

摘要

为评估米托蒽醌(MXT)、依托泊苷(VP - 16)、长春地辛(VDS)和泼尼松龙(MEVP疗法)的新型联合化疗方案作为非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)一线化疗方案的疗效,对57例II - IV期中级或高级NHL患者进行了一项前瞻性随机研究,比较该疗法(28例患者)与CHOP疗法(29例患者)。MEVP疗法包括第1天静脉注射10 mg/m²的MXT、第1天静脉注射2 mg/m²的VDS、第1 - 3天口服200 mg/m²的VP - 16以及第1 - 5天口服40 mg/m²的泼尼松龙。该方案每3周重复一次,最多进行10个疗程。接受MEVP疗法的27例可评估患者中有17例(63.0%)达到完全缓解(CR),接受CHOP疗法的28例可评估患者中有20例(71.4%)达到完全缓解。MEVP组3年无复发生存率和总生存率分别为58.8%和46.4%,CHOP组分别为70.0%和54.0%。MEVP组粒细胞减少更严重,相关感染发作更频繁。MEVP疗法作为中级和高级NHL的一线化疗有效,尽管其治疗效果不优于CHOP疗法,且毒性不比CHOP小。

相似文献

1
A comparative study of CHOP versus MEVP (mitoxantrone, etoposide, vindesine, prednisolone) therapy for intermediate-grade and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a prospective randomized study.CHOP方案与MEVP方案(米托蒽醌、依托泊苷、长春地辛、泼尼松龙)治疗中高度非霍奇金淋巴瘤的比较研究:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Int J Hematol. 1993 Jan;57(1):67-71.
2
[Alternating CHOP-MEVP chemotherapy for advanced-stage, intermediate- and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas].[交替使用CHOP-MEVP方案化疗治疗晚期中高级别非霍奇金淋巴瘤]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1993 Nov;20(14):2191-4.
3
[Comparison of chemotherapy CHOP vs. CHOP/VIA in the treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a randomized multicenter study of 132 patients. The PETHEMA group. Program for Study and Therapeutics of malignant hemopathies. Spanish Association of Hematology and Hemotherapy].[化疗CHOP方案与CHOP/VIA方案治疗侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的比较:132例患者的随机多中心研究。PETHEMA组。恶性血液病研究与治疗项目。西班牙血液学与血液治疗协会]
Med Clin (Barc). 1998 May 9;110(16):601-4.
4
[Comparing CHOP, CHOP+HD-MTX,and BFM-90 regimens in the survival rate of children and adolescents with B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma].[比较CHOP、CHOP+HD-MTX和BFM-90方案对儿童和青少年B细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤生存率的影响]
Ai Zheng. 2004 Aug;23(8):933-8.
5
Impact of three courses of intensified CHOP prior to high-dose sequential therapy followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation as first-line treatment in poor-risk, aggressive non-hodgkin's lymphoma: comparative analysis of Dutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Cooperative Group Studies 27 and 40.在高危侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤一线治疗中,大剂量序贯疗法联合自体干细胞移植前进行三个疗程强化CHOP方案的影响:荷兰-比利时血液肿瘤协作组研究27和40的对比分析
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jun 1;23(16):3793-801. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.039. Epub 2005 Apr 4.
6
[Weekly CHOP chemotherapy in the treatment of intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas--cooperative group study by seven institutes].
Rinsho Ketsueki. 1990 Oct;31(10):1656-63.
7
[Treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with the ProMACE- CytaBOM protocol].采用ProMACE-CytaBOM方案治疗侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 1998 Sep-Oct;126(9-10):345-8.
8
Long-term outcome of localized high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with high dose CHOP regimen and involved field radiotherapy: results of a GOELAMS study.采用高剂量CHOP方案及受累野放疗治疗局限性高级别非霍奇金淋巴瘤的长期疗效:GOELAMS研究结果
Haematologica. 2005 Jun;90(6):802-9.
9
Treatment of relapsed aggressive lymphomas: regimens with and without high-dose therapy and stem cell rescue.复发侵袭性淋巴瘤的治疗:含与不含高剂量治疗及干细胞救援的方案
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2002 May;49 Suppl 1:S13-20. doi: 10.1007/s00280-002-0447-1. Epub 2002 Apr 12.
10
A phase II multicenter trial of high-dose sequential chemotherapy and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation as initial therapy for patients with high-risk non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.一项针对高危非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的高剂量序贯化疗及外周血干细胞移植作为初始治疗的II期多中心试验。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 1997 Oct;3(4):210-6.