Suppr超能文献

p53基因中位点突变的检测:单链构象多态性、恒定变性剂凝胶电泳以及羟胺和四氧化锇技术的比较

Detection of point mutations in the p53 gene: comparison of single-strand conformation polymorphism, constant denaturant gel electrophoresis, and hydroxylamine and osmium tetroxide techniques.

作者信息

Condie A, Eeles R, Borresen A L, Coles C, Cooper C, Prosser J

机构信息

Human Genetics Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland.

出版信息

Hum Mutat. 1993;2(1):58-66. doi: 10.1002/humu.1380020111.

Abstract

A comparison was made between the 3 most commonly used techniques for the detection of point mutations: single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP), constant denaturant gel electrophoresis (CDGE), and hydroxylamine and osmium tetroxide used in amplification mismatch cleavage analysis (HOT). Using human DNA samples containing known mutations in the p53 gene, SSCP detected 90% of mutations (18/20), CDGE detected 88% (15/17) pre-decoding of the samples but 100% when the mutations were known and the CDGE conditions optimized, and the HOT technique was 100% accurate, although 1 mutation was missed through careless examination of the gel. The positive and negative aspects of each of the techniques are considered and suggestions are made regarding the particular situations in which each of them is most useful.

摘要

对检测点突变的3种最常用技术进行了比较:单链构象多态性(SSCP)、恒定变性剂凝胶电泳(CDGE)以及用于扩增错配切割分析(HOT)的羟胺和四氧化锇。使用含有p53基因已知突变的人类DNA样本,SSCP检测到90%的突变(20个中的18个),CDGE在样本预解码时检测到88%(17个中的15个),但当突变已知且CDGE条件优化时检测率为100%,HOT技术的准确率为100%,不过有1个突变因对凝胶检查不仔细而遗漏。文中考虑了每种技术的优缺点,并针对它们各自最适用的特定情况提出了建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验