Suppr超能文献

针对残疾儿童阅读教学的两种方法:课程设计有影响吗?

Two approaches to reading instruction with children with disabilities: does program design make a difference?

作者信息

O'Connor R E, Jenkins J R, Cole K N, Mills P E

机构信息

University of Washington.

出版信息

Except Child. 1993 Feb;59(4):312-23. doi: 10.1177/001440299305900404.

Abstract

This study examined the effects on reading achievement of variation in program design and tested the hypothesis this Distar Reading Mastery's (Engelmann & Bruner, 1988b) demonstrated effects with disadvantaged children in Project Follow Through can be generalized to children with disabilities. We compared the effects of two synthetic phonics reading programs, Direct Instruction (DI) Reading Mastery I and II and Addison Wesley's Meet the Superkids and The Superkids' Club, (Rowland, 1982a, 1982b) for 81 children in transitional kindergarten special education classes. No significant achievement differences were evident for the instructional program either at the end of the treatment year, or on follow-up testing 1 year later. However, among children who made advanced progress, the DI group showed larger reading gains.

摘要

本研究考察了课程设计变化对阅读成绩的影响,并检验了以下假设:迪斯特阅读掌握法(恩格尔曼和布鲁纳,1988b)在跟进计划中对弱势儿童所显示出的效果可以推广到残疾儿童身上。我们比较了两种综合自然拼读阅读课程——直接教学法(DI)的《阅读掌握I》和《阅读掌握II》,以及艾迪生·韦斯利出版公司的《遇见超级儿童》和《超级儿童俱乐部》(罗兰,1982a,1982b)对81名处于过渡幼儿园特殊教育班级儿童的效果。无论是在治疗学年结束时,还是在1年后的随访测试中,教学课程在成绩上都没有明显的显著差异。然而,在取得显著进步的儿童中,直接教学法组的阅读成绩提高幅度更大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验