• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

管理式竞争的历史与原则。

The history and principles of managed competition.

作者信息

Enthoven A C

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 1993;12 Suppl:24-48. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.12.suppl_1.24.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.12.suppl_1.24
PMID:8477935
Abstract

Managed competition in health care is an idea that has evolved over two decades of research and refinement. It is defined as a purchasing strategy to obtain maximum value for consumers and employers, using rules for competition derived from microeconomic principles. A sponsor (either an employer, a governmental entity, or a purchasing cooperative), acting on behalf of a large group of subscribers, structures and adjusts the market to overcome attempts by insurers to avoid price competition. The sponsor establishes rules of equity, selects participating plans, manages the enrollment process, creates price-elastic demand, and manages risk selection. Managed competition is based on comprehensive care organizations that integrate financing and delivery. Prospects for its success are based on the success and potential of a number of high-quality, cost-effective, organized systems of care already in existence, especially prepaid group practices. As it is outlined here, managed competition as a means to reform the U.S. health care system is compatible with Americans' preferences for pluralism, individual choice and responsibility, and universal coverage.

摘要

医疗保健中的管理式竞争是一个经过二十多年研究和完善而发展起来的理念。它被定义为一种采购策略,利用从微观经济原则推导出来的竞争规则,为消费者和雇主获取最大价值。一个赞助者(雇主、政府实体或采购合作社)代表一大群订阅者行事,构建并调整市场,以克服保险公司避免价格竞争的企图。赞助者制定公平规则,选择参与计划,管理注册过程,创造价格弹性需求,并管理风险选择。管理式竞争基于整合融资和服务提供的综合护理组织。其成功的前景取决于现有的一些高质量、高性价比、有组织的护理系统的成功和潜力,特别是预付团体医疗模式。如此处所述,管理式竞争作为改革美国医疗保健系统的一种手段,与美国人对多元化、个人选择和责任以及全民覆盖的偏好相契合。

相似文献

1
The history and principles of managed competition.管理式竞争的历史与原则。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1993;12 Suppl:24-48. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.12.suppl_1.24.
2
A bridge to compromise: competition under a budget.妥协的桥梁:预算约束下的竞争
Health Aff (Millwood). 1993;12 Suppl:7-23. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.12.suppl_1.7.
3
Health care reform: managed competition and beyond.医疗保健改革:管理式竞争及其他。
EBRI Issue Brief. 1993 Mar(135):1-33.
4
Market reform and universal coverage: avoid market failure.市场改革与全民医保覆盖:避免市场失灵。
Health Care Strateg Manage. 1993 Feb;11(2):11-4.
5
Managed competition estimates for policy making.
Health Aff (Millwood). 1993;12 Suppl:243-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.12.suppl_1.243.
6
Can managed competition solve the problems of market failure?
Health Aff (Millwood). 1993;12 Suppl:216-28. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.12.suppl_1.216.
7
Single-payer versus managed competition: implications for nurses.单一支付体系与管理式竞争:对护士的影响
J Nurs Educ. 1994 May;33(5):198-207. doi: 10.3928/0148-4834-19940501-04.
8
Questions and answers about managed competition.关于管理式竞争的问答
Int J Health Serv. 1993;23(2):213-8. doi: 10.2190/DJA5-CGCB-M4RJ-3VW9.
9
Managed competition: little cost containment without budget limits.
Health Aff (Millwood). 1993;12 Suppl:204-15. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.12.suppl_1.204.
10
Health care reform: clarifying the concepts.医疗保健改革:厘清概念。
J Community Health Nurs. 1993;10(4):199-211. doi: 10.1207/s15327655jchn1004_1.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Trust in Health Insurers: Insights from Enrollees' Perceptions and Experiences.探索对健康保险公司的信任:来自参保者认知与体验的见解
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2025 Jun 9;13(2):29. doi: 10.3390/jmahp13020029. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Health insurance premium in Colombia for 2025: a strictly political-ideological decision without technical-scientific arguments?2025年哥伦比亚的医疗保险费:这是一个没有技术科学依据的纯粹政治意识形态决定吗?
Health Econ Rev. 2025 Apr 8;15(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13561-025-00620-z.
3
Challenging selective contracting: reforms for enhancing patient empowerment in healthcare.
挑战选择性合同:增强医疗保健中患者赋权的改革措施。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2025 Mar 6;14(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13584-025-00673-9.
4
Measuring Active Purchasing in Healthcare: Analysing Reallocations of Funds Between Providers to Evaluate Purchasing Systems Performance in the Netherlands.衡量医疗保健领域的主动采购:分析供应商之间的资金重新分配以评估荷兰采购系统的绩效。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7506. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7506. Epub 2023 Sep 17.
5
Unveiling the truth: is COVID-19 reimbursement in Colombia a flawed design? A cost-of-illness analysis for moderate, severe and critical infections.揭开真相:哥伦比亚的 COVID-19 报销制度是否存在缺陷?对中度、重度和重症感染的疾病成本分析。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2024 Apr 5;11(1):e002097. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-002097.
6
Scope and Incentives for Risk Selection in Health Insurance Markets With Regulated Competition: A Conceptual Framework and International Comparison.具有监管竞争的健康保险市场中的风险选择范围和激励措施:概念框架与国际比较。
Med Care Res Rev. 2024 Jun;81(3):175-194. doi: 10.1177/10775587231222584. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
7
Separating the wheat from the chaff: How to measure hospital quality in routine data?去芜存菁:如何在常规数据中衡量医院质量?
Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr;59(2):e14282. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14282. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
8
How is enrollees' trust in health insurers associated with choosing health insurance?被保险人对健康保险公司的信任如何与选择健康保险相关?
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 2;18(11):e0292964. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292964. eCollection 2023.
9
Options for states to constrain pricing power of health care providers.各州限制医疗服务提供者定价权的方式。
Front Health Serv. 2022 Oct 19;2:1020920. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.1020920. eCollection 2022.
10
The relation between trust and the willingness of enrollees to receive healthcare advice from their health insurer.信任与参保人接受健康保险公司提供的医疗保健建议的意愿之间的关系。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jan 18;23(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-09016-9.