Suppr超能文献

[体外震波碎石术作为胆结石的治疗方法是否仍合理?]

[Is extracorporeal cholelithotripsy still justified as treatment in cholelithiasis?].

作者信息

Groebli Y, Tschantz P

机构信息

Service de chirurgie, Hôpital des Cadolles, Neuchâtel.

出版信息

Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1993 Apr 10;123(14):637-41.

PMID:8480161
Abstract

This prospective study evaluates the results of extracorporeal shock-wave piezoelectric lithotripsy in 52 patients, 41 with radiolucent and 11 with calcified shell gallstones. The fragmentation rate was above 90% and the complication rate 31%, with pain or intolerance to the adjuvant dissolution therapy in particular. At the end of the treatment, 7 cholecystectomies were carried out among the 31 patients in whom lithotripsy failed. After 18 months, the success rate was 23% and only 12 patients remained stone free. Nowadays, thanks to the new laparoscopic therapy, extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy is no longer judged appropriate, particularly in view of its poor cost-effectiveness and high recurrence ratio.

摘要

这项前瞻性研究评估了52例患者接受体外冲击波压电碎石术的结果,其中41例为透X线胆囊结石患者,11例为钙化外壳胆囊结石患者。碎石率高于90%,并发症发生率为31%,尤其是出现疼痛或对辅助溶石治疗不耐受。治疗结束时,在31例碎石失败的患者中进行了7例胆囊切除术。18个月后,成功率为23%,只有12例患者结石消失。如今,由于新的腹腔镜治疗方法,体外冲击波碎石术不再被认为是合适的,特别是考虑到其成本效益差和复发率高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验