Ata A H, el Bassiouny A E, Shaker Z A, Attia M M, el Khashab M N, el Gammal N E, Mourad A A, el Ghoneimy S
Department of Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Imbaba, Egypt.
J Egypt Soc Parasitol. 1993 Apr;23(1):277-88.
Circulating antifilarial IgM and IgG antibodies were assessed by indirect ELISA in 184 serum specimens from 80 patients with clinically and parasitologically diagnosed filarial infections (20 with acute filariasis 40 with chronic filariasis & 20 asymptomatic microfilaraemic subjects), 64 individuals with other parasitic infections, 20 parasitologically-free subjects from filariasis endemic areas and 20 normal healthy controls. A soluble surface membrane extract from Dirofilaria immitis worms was used as the antigen. Using a single serum dilution of 1:128 and optical densities (OD) at 492 nm, the respective cut off values for IgM and IgG were found to be 0.24 and 0.22. All healthy non-endemic controls were seronegative by IgM and IgG ELISAs. The highest antifilarial IgM OD492 values were obtained in 20 patients with acute filariasis (95% sensitivity), while the highest antifilarial IgG OD492 values were observed n 40 patients with chronic filariaisis (97.5% sensitivity). Asymptomatic microfilaraemic subjects gave IgM and IgG OD492 values which were significantly lower than those of other forms of clinical disease and endemic control subjects. The antifilarial IgM and IgG respective sensitivities in asymptomatic subjects were 75% and 70%. Endemic controls had positive antifilarial IgM (65%) and IgG (75%) levels. Of 64 subjects with other parasites only one with Ancylostoma duodenale had positive IgM level (98.4% specificity); while 9 patients with nematodal infections mainly had false positive antifilarial IgG antibody levels (85.9% specificity). These results suggest that measuring circulating antifilarial IgM antibody level may have some diagnostic advantage over measuring IgG antibody level for the detection of active filarial infection and consequently better management of the disease.
采用间接ELISA法检测了80例临床和寄生虫学诊断为丝虫感染患者(20例急性丝虫病、40例慢性丝虫病和20例无症状微丝蚴血症患者)、64例其他寄生虫感染个体、20例来自丝虫病流行区且寄生虫学检查阴性的个体以及20例正常健康对照者的184份血清标本中的循环抗丝虫IgM和IgG抗体。使用犬恶丝虫的可溶性表面膜提取物作为抗原。采用1:128的单一血清稀释度和492nm处的光密度(OD),发现IgM和IgG的各自临界值分别为0.24和0.22。所有健康的非流行区对照者的IgM和IgG ELISA检测均为血清阴性。20例急性丝虫病患者获得了最高的抗丝虫IgM OD492值(敏感性95%),而40例慢性丝虫病患者观察到了最高的抗丝虫IgG OD492值(敏感性97.5%)。无症状微丝蚴血症患者的IgM和IgG OD492值显著低于其他临床疾病形式和流行区对照者。无症状患者中抗丝虫IgM和IgG的各自敏感性分别为75%和70%。流行区对照者的抗丝虫IgM(65%)和IgG(75%)水平呈阳性。在64例其他寄生虫感染者中,仅1例十二指肠钩虫感染者的IgM水平呈阳性(特异性98.4%);而9例线虫感染者主要有抗丝虫IgG抗体水平假阳性(特异性85.9%)。这些结果表明,在检测活动性丝虫感染及因此更好地管理该疾病方面,检测循环抗丝虫IgM抗体水平可能比检测IgG抗体水平具有一些诊断优势。