Svendsen B B
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1977 Mar;55(3):161-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1977.tb00154.x.
In Scandinavia during the past decade forensic psychiatry has been the subject of discussions, which have occasionally reached the height of vehement attacks. Changes in penal laws have expressed a declining interest in the cooperation of psychiatrists in the evaluation and treatment of offenders. Scandinavian forensic psychiatrists, lawyers and criminologists have analyzed and discussed the present situation and have found that there is still a need and justification for forensic psychiatry. Higher priority, however, should be given to psychiatric contributions at the stage after disposition, at the post-trial level. The diagnostic activities at the pre-trial level should be limited to what is necessary for further dispositions. The development of forensic (penal) psychiatry and the trends with the individual Scandinavian countries differ considerably.
在过去十年里,斯堪的纳维亚半岛的法医精神病学一直是讨论的主题,这些讨论偶尔会演变成激烈的攻击。刑法的变化表明,对精神病医生在罪犯评估和治疗方面合作的兴趣在下降。斯堪的纳维亚半岛的法医精神病学家、律师和犯罪学家分析并讨论了当前的形势,发现法医精神病学仍然有存在的必要和正当理由。然而,应该在处置后的阶段,即审判后阶段,给予精神病学贡献更高的优先级。审前阶段的诊断活动应限于进一步处置所必需的范围。法医(刑事)精神病学的发展以及各个斯堪的纳维亚国家的趋势差异很大。