Molitor H
Neurological Department, Juliusspital Würzburg, Fed. Rep. of Germany.
Neurosurg Rev. 1993;16(1):39-44. doi: 10.1007/BF00308612.
The aim of the present study was to determine the significance of different SEP techniques and parameters in clinical evaluation of cases of lumbar and cervical root lesions and stenosis of the spinal canal. Using a qualitative rating scale, 92 cases were analyzed retrospectively whose primary diagnosis was questioned because of conflicting data from clinical, neuroradiological and neurophysiological testing. In conclusion SEP techniques proved to be a useful tool in exclusing other e.g. demyelinating diseases. Except for the time-consuming method of segmental stimulation, the demonstration of the functional deficit itself by SEP techniques in general was frequently disappointing. The contribution of the different SEP parameters to clinical decision making and the clinical consequences are briefly discussed.
本研究的目的是确定不同的体感诱发电位(SEP)技术和参数在腰椎和颈椎神经根病变及椎管狭窄病例临床评估中的意义。采用定性评分量表,对92例因临床、神经放射学和神经生理学检查数据相互矛盾而导致初步诊断存疑的病例进行回顾性分析。总之,SEP技术被证明是排除其他如脱髓鞘疾病的有用工具。除了节段性刺激这种耗时的方法外,SEP技术总体上对功能缺损本身的显示常常令人失望。文中简要讨论了不同SEP参数对临床决策的贡献及临床后果。