Allan L G, Siegel S
Department of Psychology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Psychol Rev. 1993 Apr;100(2):342-6; discussion 347-50. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.100.2.342.
P. C. Dodwell and G. K. Humphrey (1990) criticized the Pavlovian conditioning analysis of the McCollough effect, claiming that it was conceptually flawed and that it did not assign the McCollough effect any useful function. In this article, it is suggested that the error-correction interpretation that Dodwell and Humphrey proposed as an ostensible alternative to the conditioning interpretation can be subsumed by the conditioning interpretation. Furthermore, the conditioning interpretation does ascribe a useful function to the McCollough effect.
P. C. 多德韦尔和G. K. 汉弗莱（1990年）批评了对麦科洛效应的巴甫洛夫条件作用分析，称其在概念上存在缺陷，且未赋予麦科洛效应任何有用的功能。在本文中，有人提出，多德韦尔和汉弗莱提出的作为条件作用解释表面替代方案的错误校正解释，可以被条件作用解释所涵盖。此外，条件作用解释确实赋予了麦科洛效应一个有用的功能。
