Fabrega H
University of Pittsburg School of Medicine, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, PA 15213.
Behav Sci. 1993 Apr;38(2):75-100. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830380202.
This essay relies on a positivistic/scientific perspective to define psychiatric phenomena. However, it draws a distinction between a biomedical versus a social science approach. The aim is to review some of the theoretical and empirical considerations that pertain to psychiatric phenomena that need to be addressed in order to develop a social theory about them. The object of the theory is to explain how psychiatric phenomena are labeled, interpreted, and handled across societies that differ in terms of social structure and culture. Some of the kinds of variables and questions that would allow for cross-cultural analyses are identified. In addition, two topics that a social theory could address--that of the medicalization and stigmatization of psychiatric phenomena--are introduced. These topics are elaborated by developing propositions that substantively illustrate the questions/hypotheses of a social theory of psychiatric phenomena. The essay illustrates that a social theory constitutes a complex enterprise that requires dealing with philosophical, methodological and empirical issues.
本文依靠实证主义/科学视角来界定精神疾病现象。然而,它区分了生物医学方法与社会科学方法。目的是回顾一些与精神疾病现象相关的理论和实证考量,这些考量是为了构建关于精神疾病现象的社会理论而需要探讨的。该理论的目标是解释在社会结构和文化方面存在差异的各个社会中,精神疾病现象是如何被标记、解释和处理的。确定了一些能够进行跨文化分析的变量类型和问题。此外,还引入了社会理论可以探讨的两个主题——精神疾病现象的医学化和污名化。通过提出命题来详细阐述这些主题,这些命题实质性地说明了精神疾病现象社会理论的问题/假设。本文表明,社会理论是一项复杂的工作,需要处理哲学、方法论和实证问题。