• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内侧前脑刺激的主观奖励强度与刺激串持续时间和脉冲频率的关系。

Subjective reward magnitude of medial forebrain stimulation as a function of train duration and pulse frequency.

作者信息

Mark T A, Gallistel C R

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles 90024-1563.

出版信息

Behav Neurosci. 1993 Apr;107(2):389-401. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.107.2.389.

DOI:10.1037//0735-7044.107.2.389
PMID:8484902
Abstract

The growth of the subjective reward magnitude of medial forebrain bundle stimulation in the rat (Sprague-Dawley) as a function of train duration and pulse frequency was measured in 2 ways: (a) a titration method, which used differences in rate of reward on 2 levers to compensate for differences in the magnitude of the rewards; and (b) a direct method, in which the ratio of the reward magnitudes at the 2 levers was assumed to be given by the ratio of times spent on each lever. The results of the 2 methods agree. Reward magnitude grows as approximately a power function of train duration up to train durations of about 1 s, then declines somewhat over the interval from 2-20 s. The exponent of growth varies from 0.4 to 2.3. With stronger stimulation (higher pulse frequency), peak reward magnitude is bigger, but the saturating train duration is approximately the same.

摘要

采用两种方法测量了大鼠(斯普拉格-道利大鼠)内侧前脑束刺激主观奖励强度随串刺激持续时间和脉冲频率的变化:(a) 滴定法,该方法利用两个杠杆上奖励率的差异来补偿奖励强度的差异;(b) 直接法,该方法假定两个杠杆上奖励强度的比值由在每个杠杆上花费时间的比值给出。两种方法的结果一致。奖励强度在串刺激持续时间约为1秒之前近似呈幂函数增长,然后在2 - 20秒的区间内有所下降。增长指数在0.4到2.3之间变化。刺激越强(脉冲频率越高),峰值奖励强度越大,但饱和串刺激持续时间大致相同。

相似文献

1
Subjective reward magnitude of medial forebrain stimulation as a function of train duration and pulse frequency.内侧前脑刺激的主观奖励强度与刺激串持续时间和脉冲频率的关系。
Behav Neurosci. 1993 Apr;107(2):389-401. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.107.2.389.
2
Measuring the subjective magnitude of brain stimulation reward by titration with rate of reward.
Behav Neurosci. 1991 Dec;105(6):913-25.
3
Saturation of subjective reward magnitude as a function of current and pulse frequency.
Behav Neurosci. 1994 Feb;108(1):151-60. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.108.1.151.
4
Effect of current on the maximum possible reward.
Behav Neurosci. 1991 Dec;105(6):901-12.
5
Optimization of Medial Forebrain Bundle Stimulation Parameters for Operant Conditioning of Rats.用于大鼠操作性条件反射的内侧前脑束刺激参数优化
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2019;97(1):1-9. doi: 10.1159/000497151. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
6
Acupuncture Modulates Intracranial Self-Stimulation of the Medial Forebrain Bundle in Rats.针刺调节大鼠内侧前额叶束的颅内自我刺激。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jul 14;22(14):7519. doi: 10.3390/ijms22147519.
7
Psychophysical inference of frequency-following fidelity in the neural substrate for brain stimulation reward.脑刺激奖赏神经基质中频率跟随保真度的心理物理学推断
Behav Brain Res. 2015 Oct 1;292:327-41. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Jun 7.
8
Does the MFB convey functionally different reward signals?
Behav Brain Res. 1994 Jan 31;60(1):55-61. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(94)90063-9.
9
Temporal integration in self-stimulation: a paradox.
Behav Neurosci. 1984 Jun;98(3):467-8. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.98.3.467.
10
The function relating the subjective magnitude of brain stimulation reward to stimulation strength varies with site of stimulation.将脑刺激奖赏的主观强度与刺激强度联系起来的函数会因刺激部位的不同而变化。
Behav Brain Res. 1992 Dec 31;52(2):183-93. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(05)80229-3.

引用本文的文献

1
The Convergence Model of Brain Reward Circuitry: Implications for Relief of Treatment-Resistant Depression by Deep-Brain Stimulation of the Medial Forebrain Bundle.脑奖赏回路的汇聚模型:对通过内侧前脑束深部脑刺激缓解难治性抑郁症的启示。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Apr 1;16:851067. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.851067. eCollection 2022.
2
On the Similarity Between the Reinforcing and the Discriminative Properties of Intracranial Self-Stimulation.论颅内自我刺激的强化特性与辨别特性之间的相似性
Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Feb 21;16:799015. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.799015. eCollection 2022.
3
Dopamine neurons do not constitute an obligatory stage in the final common path for the evaluation and pursuit of brain stimulation reward.
多巴胺神经元并不是评估和追求脑刺激奖励的最终共同途径中的一个必经阶段。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 5;15(6):e0226722. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226722. eCollection 2020.
4
Valuation of opportunity costs by rats working for rewarding electrical brain stimulation.通过为获得奖励性脑电刺激而工作的大鼠对机会成本进行评估。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 25;12(8):e0182120. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182120. eCollection 2017.
5
Reward magnitude tracking by neural populations in ventral striatum.腹侧纹状体神经群体对奖励大小的追踪
Neuroimage. 2017 Feb 1;146:1003-1015. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.036. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
6
Optimal indolence: a normative microscopic approach to work and leisure.最优怠惰:工作与休闲的规范微观方法
J R Soc Interface. 2013 Nov 27;11(91):20130969. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0969. Print 2014 Feb 6.
7
Conditioned tone control of brain reward behavior produces highly specific representational gain in the primary auditory cortex.大脑奖赏行为的条件性音调控制在初级听觉皮层产生高度特异性的表征增益。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2009 Jul;92(1):27-34. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2009.02.008. Epub 2009 Feb 26.
8
The effects of reinforcer magnitude on timing in rats.强化物大小对大鼠计时的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 Mar;87(2):201-18. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2007.38-06.