Harding K
Clin Nurse Spec. 1993 Jan;7(1):13-6. doi: 10.1097/00002800-199301000-00004.
Four bedside glucose monitors were evaluated and compared for accuracy in correlation with concomitant laboratory glucose values. Of these four monitors--Diascan, Glucometer Q.A., Accucheck, and One Touch--two bedside glucose monitors were comparable with a correlation coefficient of 0.91 for Glucometer Q.A. and 0.90 for One Touch. These two machines were then evaluated for precision and linearity. Although the Glucometer Q.A. was more precise for all three levels of glucose, the One Touch linearity was almost perfect. Lastly, in asking nursing staff for an evaluation of One Touch and Glucometer Q.A., 15 of 16 staff members preferred One Touch.
对四款床边血糖仪进行了评估,并比较了它们与同步实验室血糖值的相关性准确性。在这四款血糖仪——Diascan、血糖仪QA、拜安时和稳豪——中,两款床边血糖仪具有可比性,血糖仪QA的相关系数为0.91,稳豪为0.90。然后对这两款仪器进行了精密度和线性评估。尽管血糖仪QA在所有三个血糖水平上都更精密,但稳豪的线性几乎完美。最后,在询问护理人员对稳豪和血糖仪QA的评价时,16名工作人员中有15人更喜欢稳豪。