Kilpatrick E S, McLeod M J, Rumley A G, Small M
Department of Pathological Biochemistry, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Diabet Med. 1994 Mar;11(2):214-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1994.tb02023.x.
A 6-week clinical evaluation of the One Touch II blood glucose meter was performed in a medical ward specializing in diabetic patients and compared to the existing Glucometer II system. Nursing staff trained in both methods performed 267 capillary blood glucose measurements using the two meters. A reference capillary blood glucose was performed simultaneously on 129 of these occasions using a Yellow Springs Instrument analyser. The One Touch II correlated better with the reference (r = 0.97) than the Glucometer II (r = 0.86) and was equally close or closer to the Yellow Springs Instrument on 82% of occasions. A greater proportion of samples measured by the One Touch II were within 15% of the reference value (83% vs 66%). There were also 17 cases where the One Touch II was able to give a measurement which was outwith the analytical range of the Glucometer II. A questionnaire revealed the nursing staff unanimously preferred using the One Touch II to their present meter. It is concluded that in a ward setting the One Touch II meter showed improved accuracy, usefulness in its wider analytical range, and a greater user preference in comparison to the Glucometer II.
在一个专门收治糖尿病患者的内科病房对One Touch II血糖仪进行了为期6周的临床评估，并与现有的血糖仪II系统进行了比较。接受过两种方法培训的护理人员使用这两种血糖仪进行了267次毛细血管血糖测量。在其中129次测量中，同时使用黄泉仪器分析仪进行了参考毛细血管血糖测量。One Touch II与参考值的相关性（r = 0.97）优于血糖仪II（r = 0.86），并且在82%的情况下与黄泉仪器的测量结果同样接近或更接近。One Touch II测量的样本中有更大比例（83%对66%）在参考值的15%范围内。还有17例情况是One Touch II能够给出血糖仪II分析范围之外的测量结果。一份问卷调查显示，护理人员一致表示比起现用的血糖仪，他们更喜欢使用One Touch II。得出的结论是，在病房环境中，与血糖仪II相比，One Touch II血糖仪显示出更高的准确性、更宽分析范围的实用性以及更高的用户偏好度。
