Suppr超能文献

创伤后应激障碍、焦虑症和抑郁症中的认知扭曲与非理性信念。

Cognitive distortions and irrational beliefs in post-traumatic stress, anxiety, and depressive disorders.

作者信息

Muran E M, Motta R W

机构信息

Hofstra University.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 1993 Mar;49(2):166-76. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199303)49:2<166::aid-jclp2270490207>3.0.co;2-6.

Abstract

This study examined the validity of PTSD by comparing the dysfunctional cognitions found in a PTSD group, a clinical group (anxiety or depression), and a nonclinical group. Subjects completed the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-II, the Impact of Event Scale, the Beck Depression Inventory, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, the Cognitive Error Questionnaire, and the Survey of Personal Beliefs. Results revealed that PTSD and clinical groups were significantly more depressed and anxious than nonclinical subjects. Unlike the PTSD group, only the clinical group endorsed more dysfunctional cognitions than the nonclinical group, which supports the uniqueness of the PTSD group as differing cognitively from clinical groups.

摘要

本研究通过比较创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)组、临床组(焦虑或抑郁)和非临床组中发现的功能失调认知,检验了PTSD的有效性。受试者完成了米隆临床多轴问卷第二版、事件影响量表、贝克抑郁量表、状态-特质焦虑量表、认知错误问卷和个人信念调查。结果显示,PTSD组和临床组的抑郁和焦虑程度明显高于非临床受试者。与PTSD组不同,只有临床组认可的功能失调认知比非临床组更多,这支持了PTSD组在认知上与临床组不同的独特性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验