Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2020 Dec;82:101928. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101928. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory - Trait version (STAI-T) was developed to measure an individual's tendency to experience anxiety, but it may lack discriminant evidence of validity based on strong observed relationships with measures of depression. The present series of meta-analyses compares STAI-T scores among individuals with depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, and nonclinical comparison groups, as well as correlations with measures of anxiety and depressive symptom severity, in order to further examine discriminant and convergent validity. A total of 388 published studies (N = 31,021) were included in the analyses. Individuals with an anxiety disorder and those with a depressive disorder displayed significantly elevated scores on the STAI-T compared to nonclinical comparison groups. Furthermore, anxiety and depressive symptom severity were similarly strongly correlated with the STAI-T (mean r = .59 - .61). However, individuals with a depressive disorder had significantly higher STAI-T scores than individuals with an anxiety disorder (Hedges's g = 0.27). Given these findings, along with previous factor analyses that have observed a depression factor on the STAI-T, describing the scale as a measure of 'trait anxiety' may be a misnomer. It is proposed that the STAI-T be considered a non-specific measure of negative affectivity rather than trait anxiety per se.
状态-特质焦虑量表-特质版(STAI-T)是为测量个体的焦虑倾向而开发的,但它可能缺乏基于与抑郁测量的强烈观察关系的鉴别有效性证据。本系列元分析比较了患有抑郁障碍、焦虑障碍和非临床对照组个体的 STAI-T 评分,以及与焦虑和抑郁症状严重程度测量的相关性,以进一步检查鉴别和收敛有效性。共有 388 项已发表的研究(N=31021)被纳入分析。与非临床对照组相比,患有焦虑障碍和抑郁障碍的个体在 STAI-T 上的得分明显升高。此外,焦虑和抑郁症状严重程度与 STAI-T 呈高度正相关(平均 r=.59-.61)。然而,患有抑郁障碍的个体的 STAI-T 得分明显高于患有焦虑障碍的个体(Hedges's g=0.27)。鉴于这些发现,以及先前观察到 STAI-T 上存在抑郁因子的因子分析,将该量表描述为“特质焦虑”的测量可能是错误的。建议将 STAI-T 视为消极情感的非特异性测量,而不是特质焦虑本身。