Suppr超能文献

特质焦虑在焦虑和抑郁中的特异性:状态-特质焦虑问卷的荟萃分析。

Specificity of trait anxiety in anxiety and depression: Meta-analysis of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.

机构信息

Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.

Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

Clin Psychol Rev. 2020 Dec;82:101928. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101928. Epub 2020 Oct 10.

Abstract

The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory - Trait version (STAI-T) was developed to measure an individual's tendency to experience anxiety, but it may lack discriminant evidence of validity based on strong observed relationships with measures of depression. The present series of meta-analyses compares STAI-T scores among individuals with depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, and nonclinical comparison groups, as well as correlations with measures of anxiety and depressive symptom severity, in order to further examine discriminant and convergent validity. A total of 388 published studies (N = 31,021) were included in the analyses. Individuals with an anxiety disorder and those with a depressive disorder displayed significantly elevated scores on the STAI-T compared to nonclinical comparison groups. Furthermore, anxiety and depressive symptom severity were similarly strongly correlated with the STAI-T (mean r = .59 - .61). However, individuals with a depressive disorder had significantly higher STAI-T scores than individuals with an anxiety disorder (Hedges's g = 0.27). Given these findings, along with previous factor analyses that have observed a depression factor on the STAI-T, describing the scale as a measure of 'trait anxiety' may be a misnomer. It is proposed that the STAI-T be considered a non-specific measure of negative affectivity rather than trait anxiety per se.

摘要

状态-特质焦虑量表-特质版(STAI-T)是为测量个体的焦虑倾向而开发的,但它可能缺乏基于与抑郁测量的强烈观察关系的鉴别有效性证据。本系列元分析比较了患有抑郁障碍、焦虑障碍和非临床对照组个体的 STAI-T 评分,以及与焦虑和抑郁症状严重程度测量的相关性,以进一步检查鉴别和收敛有效性。共有 388 项已发表的研究(N=31021)被纳入分析。与非临床对照组相比,患有焦虑障碍和抑郁障碍的个体在 STAI-T 上的得分明显升高。此外,焦虑和抑郁症状严重程度与 STAI-T 呈高度正相关(平均 r=.59-.61)。然而,患有抑郁障碍的个体的 STAI-T 得分明显高于患有焦虑障碍的个体(Hedges's g=0.27)。鉴于这些发现,以及先前观察到 STAI-T 上存在抑郁因子的因子分析,将该量表描述为“特质焦虑”的测量可能是错误的。建议将 STAI-T 视为消极情感的非特异性测量,而不是特质焦虑本身。

相似文献

1
Specificity of trait anxiety in anxiety and depression: Meta-analysis of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2020 Dec;82:101928. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101928. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
4
Self-reports of depression and state-trait anxiety: evidence for differential assessment.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992 Nov;63(5):832-8. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.63.5.832.
5
[The Fear of Negative Evaluation scale (FNE): psychometric properties of the French version].
Encephale. 2004 Nov-Dec;30(6):517-24. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95465-6.
8
Assessment of state and trait anxiety in subjects with anxiety and depressive disorders.
Psychiatr Q. 2001 Fall;72(3):263-76. doi: 10.1023/a:1010305200087.
9
The state-trait anxiety inventory, trait version: does it really measure anxiety?
J Pers Assess. 2010 Nov;92(6):560-7. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2010.513295.

引用本文的文献

1
Trait anxiety is associated with reduced reward-related replay at rest.
Nat Commun. 2025 Aug 26;16(1):7975. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-63281-w.
2
IoT-MT: Connected Care System For Elderly Anxiety Management Via Music Therapy.
Healthc Technol Lett. 2025 Aug 16;12(1):e70016. doi: 10.1049/htl2.70016. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
4
ModFus-PD: synergizing cross-modal attention and contrastive learning for enhanced multimodal diagnosis of Parkinson's disease.
Front Comput Neurosci. 2025 Jul 16;19:1604399. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2025.1604399. eCollection 2025.
5
Do expectations shape interoceptive perceptions across body domains? A sham EMF study to test the predictive processing theory.
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2025 Jul-Sep;25(3):100609. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2025.100609. Epub 2025 Jul 18.
7
Psychometric properties of the Arabic generalized anxiety disorder scale (GAD-5) in a non-clinical sample of Arabic-speaking adults.
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 8;16:1582398. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1582398. eCollection 2025.
9
Listening effort and stress in tinnitus: a multidimensional approach.
Front Neurosci. 2025 Jul 7;19:1591622. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1591622. eCollection 2025.
10
A Cross-Course Experiment with a Word Recall Task and Salivary Cortisol Measurements.
J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2025 Jun 1;23(2):A35-A42. doi: 10.59390/XIIC7680. eCollection 2025 Spring.

本文引用的文献

1
A rose by any other name…How should we refer to the collective of conditions characterized by clinically significant anxiety?
J Anxiety Disord. 2019 Dec;68:102143. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2019.102143. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
2
What Lies Beneath Trait-Anxiety? Testing the Self-Regulatory Executive Function Model of Vulnerability.
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 30;10:122. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00122. eCollection 2019.
3
Repetitive negative thinking as a mediator in prospective cross-disorder associations between anxiety and depression disorders and their symptoms.
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;63:6-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.11.007. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
4
Relations between trait anxiety and depression: A mediated moderation model.
J Affect Disord. 2019 Feb 1;244:217-222. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.09.074. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
5
Excessive generalisation of conditioned fear in trait anxious individuals under ambiguity.
Behav Res Ther. 2018 Aug;107:53-63. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2018.05.012. Epub 2018 May 30.
6
High anxiety trait: A vulnerable phenotype for stress-induced depression.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 Apr;87:27-37. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.01.012. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
7
Trends in depression prevalence in the USA from 2005 to 2015: widening disparities in vulnerable groups.
Psychol Med. 2018 Jun;48(8):1308-1315. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717002781. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
8

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验