Zimmermann R, Huch A, Huch R
Department of Gynecology, Zurich University, Switzerland.
J Perinat Med. 1993;21(1):5-11.
Water births have gradually become more popular in industrialized countries during the last decade. People advocating this form of delivery argue that the buoyancy in water helps the mother to relax and that the warmth helps reduce pain, meaning that the whole labor process and experience is positively influenced and even accelerated. Due to the sitting position and lower pressure gradient, there are supposedly fewer injuries to the birth canal, and delivery is also claimed to be easier on the child. However there is a great lack of scientific data. We have found only one publication in a peer reviewed journal with some 100 water births described. In a case controlled study not published the authors found fewer birth canal injuries and less use of analgesics but the difference was only slight. There was no difference in the length of labor. Several neonatal deaths are reported during uncontrolled water births. Based on the knowledge available to date, physiologic and general considerations (e.g. risk of infections, risk of hypoxia, risk of aspiration), water births must be classified as a type of obstetrical management, whereby the risks are still too undetermined to be said to be a safe form of birth. Water births should, thus, be restricted to centers with adequate medical assistance, and only in randomized, controlled studies who fulfill the Declaration of Helsinki. In any other setting water births should be rejected, since too little is known about the safety of this method.
在过去十年中,水中分娩在工业化国家逐渐变得更加流行。提倡这种分娩方式的人认为,水中的浮力有助于母亲放松,水温有助于减轻疼痛,这意味着整个分娩过程和体验会受到积极影响甚至加快。由于坐姿和较低的压力梯度,据说产道受伤的情况较少,而且据说对胎儿来说分娩也更容易。然而,目前严重缺乏科学数据。我们在同行评审期刊上只找到了一篇描述约100例水中分娩的出版物。在一项未发表的病例对照研究中,作者发现产道损伤较少且镇痛药使用较少,但差异很小。分娩时长没有差异。在无控制的水中分娩过程中报告了几例新生儿死亡。基于目前已知的知识,从生理学和一般考虑因素(如感染风险、缺氧风险、吸入风险)来看,水中分娩必须归类为一种产科处理方式,但其风险仍未确定到足以被称为一种安全的分娩方式。因此,水中分娩应仅限于有足够医疗援助的中心,并且只能在符合《赫尔辛基宣言》的随机对照研究中进行。在任何其他情况下,水中分娩都应被摒弃,因为对这种方法的安全性了解太少。