• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过改进围手术期肠球菌和拟杆菌治疗,腹部手术伤口感染率降低。

Abdominal surgical wound infection is lowered with improved perioperative enterococcus and bacteroides therapy.

作者信息

Weigelt J A, Easley S M, Thal E R, Palmer L D, Newman V S

机构信息

Department of Surgery, St. Paul-Ramsey Medical Center, Minnesota 55101.

出版信息

J Trauma. 1993 Apr;34(4):579-84; discussion 584-5. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199304000-00016.

DOI:10.1097/00005373-199304000-00016
PMID:8487344
Abstract

Perioperative antibiotics decrease surgical wound infection (SWI) in trauma patients requiring abdominal exploration. This investigation evaluated 24 hours of cefoxitin or ampicillin/sulbactam used for early therapy in such patients. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. The primary endpoint evaluated was SWI, which was defined as purulent drainage or active wound treatment. Five hundred ninety-two patients were evaluated: 283 received ampicillin/sulbactam and 309 received cefoxitin. The incidence of wound infection among the ampicillin/sulbactam patients was 2% and among cefoxitin patients it was 7% (p < 0.004). The cefoxitin patients with colon injuries were analyzed (p < 0.007). The major difference between the two groups was an increased incidence of enterococcal infections in the cefoxitin-treated patients. A single broad-spectrum antibiotic given for 24 hour perioperatively effectively controls SWI. Use of ampicillin/sulbactam results in a significantly lower SWI rate than use of cefoxitin, which may be a result of improved enterococcal and Bacteroides coverage.

摘要

围手术期使用抗生素可降低需要进行腹部探查的创伤患者的手术伤口感染(SWI)发生率。本研究评估了头孢西丁或氨苄西林/舒巴坦用于此类患者早期治疗24小时的效果。患者被随机分配到两个治疗组之一。评估的主要终点是手术伤口感染,定义为脓性引流或积极的伤口处理。共评估了592例患者:283例接受氨苄西林/舒巴坦治疗,309例接受头孢西丁治疗。氨苄西林/舒巴坦组患者的伤口感染发生率为2%,头孢西丁组为7%(p<0.004)。对结肠损伤的头孢西丁组患者进行了分析(p<0.007)。两组之间的主要差异是头孢西丁治疗组患者的肠球菌感染发生率增加。围手术期使用单一广谱抗生素24小时可有效控制手术伤口感染。与使用头孢西丁相比,使用氨苄西林/舒巴坦可使手术伤口感染率显著降低,这可能是由于对肠球菌和拟杆菌的覆盖范围改善所致。

相似文献

1
Abdominal surgical wound infection is lowered with improved perioperative enterococcus and bacteroides therapy.通过改进围手术期肠球菌和拟杆菌治疗,腹部手术伤口感染率降低。
J Trauma. 1993 Apr;34(4):579-84; discussion 584-5. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199304000-00016.
2
Ampicillin-sulbactam versus cefoxitin for prophylaxis in high-risk patients undergoing abdominal surgery.氨苄西林-舒巴坦与头孢西丁用于腹部手术高危患者预防感染的比较。
Pharmacotherapy. 1994 Nov-Dec;14(6):734-9.
3
Antibiotic prophylaxis in transurethral surgery: a comparison of sulbactam-ampicillin and cefoxitin.
Infection. 1985 Mar-Apr;13(2):66-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01660416.
4
Infectious complications after 809 biliary tract operations and results of a prospective randomized single-blind study comparing cefoxitin versus ampicillin plus an inhibitor of beta-lactamases.809例胆道手术后的感染并发症以及一项比较头孢西丁与氨苄西林加β-内酰胺酶抑制剂的前瞻性随机单盲研究结果
Infection. 1990 Jan-Feb;18(1):41-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01644184.
5
Sulbactam/ampicillin compared with cefoxitin for chemoprophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery.
Dis Colon Rectum. 1986 Mar;29(3):157-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02555011.
6
Discordance Between Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Wound Infection Cultures in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy.胰十二指肠切除术患者围手术期抗生素预防与伤口感染培养之间的不相符。
JAMA Surg. 2016 May 1;151(5):432-9. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.4510.
7
[Acute bacterial salpingitis. The importance of residual inflammation. A comparative study with celioscopic control of 2 antibiotic protocols: sulbactam-ampicillin versus cefoxitin].
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1990;19(6):765-72.
8
Single-agent therapy for acute pelvic inflammatory disease: sulbactam/ampicillin versus cefoxitin.
J Int Med Res. 1990;18 Suppl 4:85D-89D.
9
The value of chemoprophylaxis against Enterococcus species in elective cholecystectomy: a randomized study of cefuroxime vs ampicillin-sulbactam.选择性胆囊切除术中针对肠球菌属进行化学预防的价值:头孢呋辛与氨苄西林-舒巴坦的随机对照研究
Arch Surg. 2006 Dec;141(12):1162-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.12.1162.
10
Perioperative prophylaxis with sulbactam and ampicillin compared with metronidazole and cefotaxime in the prevention of wound infection in children undergoing appendectomy.在接受阑尾切除术的儿童中,舒巴坦和氨苄西林围手术期预防与甲硝唑和头孢噻肟预防伤口感染的比较。
J Pediatr Surg. 1987 Sep;22(9):869-72. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(87)80658-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Microbiological profile and antimicrobial susceptibility in surgical site infections following hollow viscus injury.空心内脏损伤术后手术部位感染的微生物分布及药敏情况。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Aug;14(8):1304-10. doi: 10.1007/s11605-010-1231-x. Epub 2010 May 25.
2
Multicenter study evaluating the role of enterococci in secondary bacterial peritonitis.多中心研究评估肠球菌在继发性细菌性腹膜炎中的作用。
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Feb;48(2):456-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01782-09. Epub 2009 Nov 25.
3
Current prophylactic perioperative antibiotic guidelines in trauma: a review of the literature and outcome data.
当前创伤预防性围手术期抗生素指南:文献回顾与结果数据。
Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2009 Oct;9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S46-S53. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2009.2762.
4
Antibiotics and gastrointestinal colonization by vancomycin-resistant enterococci.抗生素与耐万古霉素肠球菌在胃肠道的定植
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005 Dec;24(12):804-14. doi: 10.1007/s10096-005-0057-z.
5
Effect of antibiotic therapy on the density of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in the stool of colonized patients.抗生素治疗对定植患者粪便中耐万古霉素肠球菌密度的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2000 Dec 28;343(26):1925-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200012283432604.
6
Postsurgical complications in older patients. The role of pharmacological intervention.老年患者的术后并发症。药物干预的作用。
Drugs Aging. 1994 Dec;5(6):419-30. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199405060-00004.