Suppr超能文献

Antibiotic prophylaxis in transurethral surgery: a comparison of sulbactam-ampicillin and cefoxitin.

作者信息

Dørflinger T, Madsen P O

出版信息

Infection. 1985 Mar-Apr;13(2):66-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01660416.

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of perioperative prophylaxis with sulbactam-ampicillin or cefoxitin was compared in a prospective randomized double-blind study of 103 patients undergoing transurethral surgery. Fifty-two patients received 0.5 g sulbactam and 1 g ampicillin intramuscularly, 30 to 90 minutes prior to surgery, followed by the same dose administered intravenously every eight hours for a total of three additional doses over 24 hours. Fifty-one patients received 1 g of cefoxitin administered according to the same schedule as sulbactam-ampicillin. The incidence of urinary tract infection during hospitalization was 8% in the sulbactam-ampicillin group and 4% in the cefoxitin group. One month postoperatively the incidences were 3% and 5%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the groups in incidence of fever or length of postoperative hospital stay. Both drugs were well tolerated. No side effects were seen other than a mild skin rash in one patient and diarrhea in two patients. Sulbactam concentrated in prostatic tissue, and ampicillin together with sulbactam was found in concentrations above the minimal inhibitory concentration of most bacteria causing postoperative urinary tract infection. It is concluded that sulbactam-ampicillin and cefoxitin are equally effective and safe in preventing postoperative urinary tract infection in transurethral surgery.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验