Curtin L, Fisher R D
Department of Psychology, University of Central Florida, Orlando 32816.
J Stud Alcohol. 1993 May;54(3):315-9. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1993.54.315.
The present study examined perception of a man's likelihood of driving after drinking and his ability to do so as a function of his choice of beverage. Perceptions of his social characteristics were also examined. The sample was composed of 200 volunteer undergraduate psychology students. Equal numbers of male and female subjects read one of four vignettes which varied only in the male protagonist's choice of beverage: beer, wine, shots of distilled spirits, or cola. After reading the story, subjects answered multiple-choice questions about the character, tapping social judgments, situational judgments and drinking and driving judgments. Subject drinking habits were also assessed. The most notable result was the consistently positive perception of the protagonist portrayed as an abstainer. The lack of a consistent alcoholic beverage distinction implies that the beer-spirits double standard is far from a clear-cut discrimination. Possible explanations for results are discussed. This study questions the robustness of the alcoholic beverage type bias and reflects the need for future research.
本研究考察了人们对男性酒后驾车可能性及其驾车能力的认知,该认知是其饮料选择的函数。同时也考察了对其社会特征的认知。样本由200名志愿本科心理学学生组成。数量相等的男性和女性受试者阅读四个小短文之一,这些短文仅在男性主角的饮料选择上有所不同:啤酒、葡萄酒、蒸馏酒或可乐。读完故事后,受试者回答关于该角色的多项选择题,涉及社会判断、情境判断以及酒驾判断。还评估了受试者的饮酒习惯。最显著的结果是,对被描绘为戒酒者的主角始终持有积极的认知。缺乏一致的酒精饮料区分意味着啤酒与烈酒的双重标准远非明确的歧视。文中讨论了结果的可能解释。本研究对酒精饮料类型偏见的稳健性提出质疑,并反映了未来研究的必要性。