Bucke D
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Fish Diseases Laboratory, Weymouth, Dorset.
Parasitology. 1993;106 Suppl:S25-37. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000086091.
As there is little evidence of pollution affecting the health of fish and shellfish on a global scale, this paper attempts to put into perspective the pollution/fish disease relationship by reviewing examples of studies and reports in the historic and current literature. Although there is no dispute that pollution can affect the aquatic organisms under laboratory conditions and may be responsible for the decline of populations of such animals in some inland waters and some estuaries, most of the evidence for pollution causing or increasing disease in fish in open waters is circumstantial. Historical data proves that almost all fish and shellfish diseases known today have been described since the end of the last century. However, it is also known that water pollution, especially in inland waters, has for the past 400-500 years been the result of urbanization and industrialization. This has resulted in some major rivers becoming devoid of or deficient in fish stocks. The concern that pollution may influence the health status of fish and shellfish stocks has increased over the past 20 years. Initial attention was paid to epidermal diseases, including fin-rot in demersal fish, and protozoan diseases in molluscs in the heavily polluted bays and estuaries in North America. As the interest in this subject spread, it became political, and often controversial, especially amongst the North Sea countries. The disagreements have largely been settled amongst scientists because international bodies, such as the International Council for Exploration of the Sea (ICES), established workshops to investigate sampling methods and disease-reporting techniques. Recommendations from those workshops have contributed to some form of standardization for field work and the subject, although largely subjective, has some objective approaches which are described. As there are variable, interacting biological and physical influences in the aquatic environment, it is difficult to establish the background prevalences of diseases in populations of fish and shellfish. Examples of the influences of climatic changes are presented, and these show that short-term catastrophes can be directly related. However, a more long-term problem is water acidification resulting largely from anthropogenic activities. In parts of Scandinavia this has, and is, leading to decimation of fish stocks in inland waters. In general, diseases in fish and shellfish are very localized, but there is concern amongst scientists that certain cancers, especially liver tumours, occurring in demersal fish inhabiting polluted estuarine and coastal waters, are related to the release of chemicals, e.g. hydrocarbons, pesticides and heavy metals.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
由于几乎没有证据表明污染在全球范围内影响鱼类和贝类的健康,本文试图通过回顾历史和当前文献中的研究及报告实例,正确看待污染与鱼类疾病的关系。虽然在实验室条件下污染会影响水生生物且可能是一些内陆水域和河口此类动物种群数量下降的原因,这一点毫无争议,但关于污染导致或增加开阔水域鱼类疾病的大多数证据都是间接的。历史数据证明,如今已知的几乎所有鱼类和贝类疾病自上世纪末就已被描述。然而,人们也知道,水污染,尤其是内陆水域的水污染,在过去400 - 500年一直是城市化和工业化的结果。这导致一些主要河流鱼类种群消失或减少。在过去20年里,人们对污染可能影响鱼类和贝类种群健康状况的担忧与日俱增。最初关注的是表皮疾病,包括底栖鱼类的鳍腐病以及北美污染严重的海湾和河口软体动物的原生动物疾病。随着对该主题兴趣的传播,它变得具有政治性,而且常常引发争议,尤其是在北海国家之间。科学家们之间的分歧在很大程度上已经得到解决,因为诸如国际海洋考察理事会(ICES)等国际机构设立了研讨会来研究采样方法和疾病报告技术。这些研讨会的建议促成了某种形式的实地工作标准化,尽管该主题在很大程度上具有主观性,但也有一些客观方法,本文对此进行了描述。由于水生环境中存在各种相互作用的生物和物理影响,很难确定鱼类和贝类种群中疾病的背景患病率。文中列举了气候变化影响的实例,这些实例表明短期灾难可能直接相关。然而,一个更长期的问题是主要由人为活动导致的水体酸化。在斯堪的纳维亚半岛的部分地区,这已经并正在导致内陆水域鱼类种群大量减少。一般来说,鱼类和贝类疾病非常具有局部性,但科学家们担心,生活在受污染河口和沿海水域的底栖鱼类中出现的某些癌症,尤其是肝肿瘤,与化学物质的释放有关,例如碳氢化合物、农药和重金属。(摘要截选至400字)