Stone J L, Lockwood C J
Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Apr;5(2):211-7.
Amniocentesis performed at 16 to 18 weeks' gestation has been the gold standard approach for prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis. Over the past few years, large collaborative studies on chorionic villus sampling have confirmed the safety and efficacy of chorionic villus sampling as a viable alternative for women seeking prenatal diagnosis. While the expanding experience with chorionic villus sampling has answered questions regarding the safety of the transabdominal approach, it has also raised questions concerning possible associations with limb abnormalities, its usefulness in multiple gestations, and the clinical significance of confined placental mosaicism. These issues, as well as the technical and gestational age limitations of chorionic villus sampling, have led many investigators to study the technical feasibility, safety, and accuracy of amniocentesis performed in the first trimester or early second trimester. While this approach appears both safe and efficacious, there are concerns regarding orthopedic abnormalities and the reliability of first-trimester amniotic fluid acetylcholinesterase and alpha-fetoprotein levels in the diagnosis of neural tube defects.
妊娠16至18周时进行羊膜穿刺术一直是产前细胞遗传学诊断的金标准方法。在过去几年中,关于绒毛取样的大型合作研究证实了绒毛取样作为寻求产前诊断的女性的一种可行替代方法的安全性和有效性。虽然绒毛取样经验的不断积累回答了有关经腹途径安全性的问题,但也引发了关于与肢体异常的可能关联、其在多胎妊娠中的实用性以及局限性胎盘嵌合体的临床意义等问题。这些问题以及绒毛取样的技术和孕周限制,促使许多研究人员研究在孕早期或孕中期早期进行羊膜穿刺术的技术可行性、安全性和准确性。虽然这种方法似乎既安全又有效,但对于骨科异常以及孕早期羊水乙酰胆碱酯酶和甲胎蛋白水平在神经管缺陷诊断中的可靠性仍存在担忧。