Smith M, Simon R, Cain D, Ungerleider R S
Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, NCI, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Cancer. 1993 May 15;71(10 Suppl):3422-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930515)71:10+<3422::aid-cncr2820711748>3.0.co;2-4.
The Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute (CTEP, NCI) strongly supports the role of controlled clinical trials in improving the care of children with cancer, and particularly the central role that the pediatric Cooperative Groups play in this process. Trends that threaten the ability to perform these trials include the increasingly limited financial resources available for clinical investigations and the sentiment within some circles that controlled clinical trials may be inappropriate for ethical reasons. The inherent risks of accepting a new therapy without rigorous comparison to existing therapy strongly support the need for randomized trials with adequate accrual to answer important therapeutic questions in a timely and reliable fashion. Retrospective analysis of multiple clinical trials is one method for identifying compelling hypotheses to be tested prospectively. Using this method, we have demonstrated the association between doxorubicin dose intensity and positive response and outcome for patients with Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma, thereby providing direction for the selection of important therapeutic questions to be addressed in future clinical trials for these malignancies.
美国国立癌症研究所癌症治疗评估项目(CTEP,NCI)大力支持对照临床试验在改善儿童癌症治疗方面所发挥的作用,尤其重视儿科协作组在此过程中所起的核心作用。威胁开展这些试验能力的趋势包括临床研究可用资金日益有限,以及一些人认为出于伦理原因对照临床试验可能不合适。在未与现有疗法进行严格比较的情况下接受新疗法存在内在风险,这有力地支持了进行有足够病例数的随机试验,以便及时、可靠地回答重要治疗问题的必要性。对多项临床试验进行回顾性分析是确定有待前瞻性检验的引人关注的假设的一种方法。通过使用这种方法,我们已经证明了阿霉素剂量强度与尤因肉瘤和骨肉瘤患者的阳性反应及预后之间的关联,从而为今后针对这些恶性肿瘤的临床试验中要解决的重要治疗问题的选择提供了方向。