DeVellis R F, DeVellis B M, Blanchard L W, Klotz M L, Luchok K, Voyce C
Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599-7330.
Health Educ Q. 1993 Summer;20(2):211-25. doi: 10.1177/109019819302000213.
We describe the development and validation of the Parent Health Locus of Control (PHLOC) scales. Using factor analytic and item analytic methods, 30 items comprising six scales were extracted from a pool of 84 items. The individual scales correspond to beliefs in Child, Divine, Fate, Media, Parental, and Professional Influence over child health. Results were compared for six samples totalling 822 parents. Internal consistency reliabilities were above .70 for all scales with all samples. Test-retest correlations based on a separate sample were all above .60. Validity was assessed by means of a known groups strategy that made use of presumed differences among the six samples studied. The results generally agreed with predicted differences, offering good initial evidence of the validity for the PHLOC scales.
我们描述了父母健康控制点(PHLOC)量表的编制与验证过程。通过因素分析和项目分析方法,从84个项目中提取了由六个量表组成的30个项目。各个量表分别对应关于儿童、神意、命运、媒体、父母及专业人员对儿童健康影响的信念。对总计822名父母的六个样本的结果进行了比较。所有样本中所有量表的内部一致性信度均高于0.70。基于一个单独样本的重测相关系数均高于0.60。通过利用所研究的六个样本之间的假定差异的已知群体策略评估效度。结果总体上与预测差异一致,为PHLOC量表的效度提供了良好的初步证据。