Bates A S, Fitzgerald J F, Wolinsky F D
Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.
Med Care. 1994 Sep;32(9):958-64. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199409000-00006.
Health locus of control (HLC) has been used to operationalize general health motivation. This study was undertaken to evaluate the internal consistency and construct validity of Tinsley and Holtgrave's Parent Health Belief Scales (PHBS) as a measure of maternal HLC toward their children's health. Five hundred mothers (71% of eligible consecutive admissions) of newborns admitted to the normal newborn nursery of a large municipal teaching hospital were interviewed 24 to 72 hours after delivery. Principal components factor analysis of the PHBS did not support the originally hypothesized three-dimensional factor structure of the PHBS. In addition, the original subscales did not have adequate internal consistency reliability. Further assessment of construct validity by comparison with maternal preventive health behaviors showed some evidence of construct validity for the scales when compared with breastfeeding behavior. When the three items written as reverse-coded Internality items are not reversed, a reliable seven-item Externality scale emerges which contains items originally thought to represent all three dimensions of HLC.
健康控制点(HLC)已被用于衡量一般健康动机。本研究旨在评估廷斯利和霍尔特格雷夫的父母健康信念量表(PHBS)作为衡量母亲对子女健康的HLC的内部一致性和结构效度。在一家大型市立教学医院的正常新生儿病房收治的新生儿的500名母亲(占符合条件的连续入院人数的71%)在分娩后24至72小时接受了访谈。PHBS的主成分因子分析不支持PHBS最初假设的三维因子结构。此外,原始子量表没有足够的内部一致性信度。通过与母亲的预防性健康行为进行比较对结构效度进行的进一步评估表明,与母乳喂养行为相比,该量表有一些结构效度的证据。当作为反向编码的内在性项目编写的三个项目不进行反向编码时,会出现一个可靠的七项外部性量表,其中包含最初认为代表HLC所有三个维度的项目。