Dodrill C B, Thoreson N S
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1993 Mar;15(2):183-90. doi: 10.1080/01688639308402556.
The reliability of the Lateral Dominance Examination over a 5-year period was evaluated in 162 normal and neurologically impaired adults. Stability of individual test items was appraised as well as that of summary measures of handedness, eyedness, and footedness. Items evaluating handedness rendered highly consistent results with the most reliable item relating to hand used for writing (100%). Eyedness and footedness items were somewhat less reliable. While the data raised the possibility that non-right-handers may be slightly less consistent over time, membership in a neurological group, extent of impairment on neuropsychological tests, and gender were unrelated to consistency in lateral preference measurement. It is concluded that the Lateral Dominance Examination is a reliable measure of lateral preference.
在162名正常及神经功能受损的成年人中,评估了为期5年的利手性检查的可靠性。对各个测试项目的稳定性以及利手、利眼和利足的综合测量指标的稳定性进行了评估。评估利手性的项目得出了高度一致的结果,其中与书写手相关的项目最为可靠(100%)。利眼和利足项目的可靠性略低。虽然数据表明非右利手者随着时间推移可能一致性略低,但神经功能组、神经心理测试的受损程度和性别与利手偏好测量的一致性无关。结论是,利手性检查是一种可靠的利手偏好测量方法。