• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

感觉统合治疗的重新审视:两项疗效研究的联合分析

Reexamination of sensory integration treatment: a combination of two efficacy studies.

作者信息

Kaplan B J, Polatajko H J, Wilson B N, Faris P D

机构信息

University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

J Learn Disabil. 1993 May;26(5):342-7. doi: 10.1177/002221949302600507.

DOI:10.1177/002221949302600507
PMID:8492053
Abstract

Little empirical support exists for the application of sensory integration treatment (SIT) to assist children with learning problems. Treatment efficacy studies are expensive and difficult to carry out, and they have necessarily employed small samples that are inevitably heterogeneous. We have reanalyzed the efficacy of SIT by combining the data from one study involving 29 children in Alberta and a second study involving 67 children in Ontario. The results from each individual study, and now the results from the combined study, lead one to the conclusion that the therapeutic effect of SIT on children with learning deficits is not greater than other, more traditional methods of intervention.

摘要

感觉统合治疗(SIT)用于帮助有学习问题的儿童,几乎没有实证支持。治疗效果研究成本高昂且难以开展,而且必然采用了不可避免具有异质性的小样本。我们通过合并一项涉及艾伯塔省29名儿童的研究和另一项涉及安大略省67名儿童的研究的数据,重新分析了感觉统合治疗的效果。每项单独研究的结果,以及现在合并研究的结果,都让人得出这样的结论:感觉统合治疗对有学习缺陷儿童的治疗效果并不比其他更传统的干预方法更好。

相似文献

1
Reexamination of sensory integration treatment: a combination of two efficacy studies.感觉统合治疗的重新审视:两项疗效研究的联合分析
J Learn Disabil. 1993 May;26(5):342-7. doi: 10.1177/002221949302600507.
2
Statement--sensory integration evaluation and intervention in school-based occupational therapy.声明——基于学校的职业治疗中的感觉统合评估与干预
Am J Occup Ther. 1997 Nov-Dec;51(10):861-3. doi: 10.5014/ajot.51.10.861.
3
Symbolic play language during sensory integration treatment.感觉统合治疗中的象征性游戏语言。
Am J Occup Ther. 1997 Nov-Dec;51(10):808-14. doi: 10.5014/ajot.51.10.808.
4
Sensory processing disorders.感觉统合失调
Minn Med. 2002 Nov;85(11):48-51.
5
A comparison of the effectiveness of sensory integrative therapy and perceptual-motor training in treating children with learning disabilities.感觉统合疗法与感知运动训练对学习障碍儿童治疗效果的比较。
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1992 Feb;13(1):31-40.
6
A critique of the application of sensory integration therapy to children with learning disabilities.对感觉统合疗法应用于学习障碍儿童的批判。
J Learn Disabil. 1994 Jun-Jul;27(6):338-50. doi: 10.1177/002221949402700601.
7
Therapist-child interaction in the middle minutes of sensory integration treatment.感觉统合治疗过程中中段时间治疗师与儿童的互动。
Am J Occup Ther. 1997 Nov-Dec;51(10):799-805. doi: 10.5014/ajot.51.10.799.
8
Statement: occupational therapy provision for children with learning disabilities and/or mild to moderate perceptual and motor deficits.声明:为有学习障碍和/或轻度至中度感知及运动缺陷的儿童提供职业治疗服务。
Am J Occup Ther. 1991 Dec;45(12):1069-74. doi: 10.5014/ajot.45.12.1069.
9
Clinical interpretation of "Therapist-child interaction in the middle minutes of sensory integration treatment".《感觉统合治疗中程阶段治疗师与儿童互动的临床解读》
Am J Occup Ther. 1997 Nov-Dec;51(10):806-7. doi: 10.5014/ajot.51.10.806.
10
A comparison of structured sensorimotor therapy and child-centered activity in the treatment of preschool children with sensorimotor problems.结构化感觉运动疗法与以儿童为中心的活动对有感觉运动问题的学龄前儿童治疗效果的比较。
Am J Occup Ther. 1993 Sep;47(9):777-86. doi: 10.5014/ajot.47.9.777.