• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全身麻醉与硬膜外麻醉用于初次剖宫产的比较研究

General anaesthesia versus epidural anaesthesia for primary caesarean section--a comparative study.

作者信息

Dick W, Traub E, Kraus H, Töllner U, Burghard R, Muck J

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital of Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1992 Jan;9(1):15-21.

PMID:1735394
Abstract

Forty-seven healthy parturients undergoing elective Caesarean section were randomly allocated to either general anaesthesia (n = 24) or epidural anaesthesia (n = 23) under standardized anaesthetic and surgical conditions. Seven women of the epidural group required additional systemic analgesia or sedation following delivery of the neonate. Nine of 24 newborns obtained 1-min Apgar scores below 7 after general anaesthesia compared to only 3/23 after epidural anaesthesia. The time period to establish normal colour in the babies was 2.2 min after epidural and 4.9 min after general anaesthesia. Three of the 24 general-anaesthesia newborns demonstrated a tendency to hypotonia compared to only one in the epidural group. Twenty-four hours and 7 days after delivery all infants of both groups were completely normal. At the time of delivery maternal PO2 was higher in the general anaesthesia compared to the epidural group, due to higher inspired oxygen concentrations. Comparable results were obtained in umbilical PO2 venous values; lower pH values, however, were observed in the umbilical artery after general anaesthesia. There were no significant differences in the glucose levels between the groups. A significant correlation was established between uterine incision-delivery interval and 1-min neonatal Apgar scores in the general-anaesthesia group, but not in the epidural group. Our investigation did not show either the incision-delivery interval or the start of operation-delivery interval to play a role in neonatal outcome. Epidural anaesthesia is superior to general anaesthesia in Caesarean section under normal conditions with regard to neonatal outcome. Whether this is also true for critical conditions cannot be concluded from this study.

摘要

47名择期剖宫产的健康产妇在标准化麻醉和手术条件下被随机分为全身麻醉组(n = 24)或硬膜外麻醉组(n = 23)。硬膜外麻醉组中有7名产妇在新生儿娩出后需要额外的全身镇痛或镇静。全身麻醉后,24名新生儿中有9名1分钟阿氏评分低于7分,而硬膜外麻醉后只有3/23。硬膜外麻醉后婴儿恢复正常肤色的时间为2.2分钟,全身麻醉后为4.9分钟。全身麻醉组的24名新生儿中有3名表现出肌张力低下的倾向,而硬膜外麻醉组只有1名。分娩后24小时和7天,两组所有婴儿均完全正常。分娩时,由于吸入氧浓度较高,全身麻醉组产妇的动脉血氧分压高于硬膜外麻醉组。脐静脉血氧分压值也得到了类似的结果;然而,全身麻醉后脐动脉的pH值较低。两组之间的血糖水平没有显著差异。全身麻醉组子宫切开至分娩间隔与新生儿1分钟阿氏评分之间存在显著相关性,而硬膜外麻醉组则没有。我们的研究没有显示子宫切开至分娩间隔或手术开始至分娩间隔对新生儿结局有影响。在正常情况下,剖宫产中硬膜外麻醉在新生儿结局方面优于全身麻醉。本研究无法得出在危急情况下是否也是如此的结论。

相似文献

1
General anaesthesia versus epidural anaesthesia for primary caesarean section--a comparative study.全身麻醉与硬膜外麻醉用于初次剖宫产的比较研究
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1992 Jan;9(1):15-21.
2
Epidural block with ropivacaine and bupivacaine for elective caesarean section: maternal cardiovascular parameters, comfort and neonatal well-being.罗哌卡因和布比卡因用于择期剖宫产的硬膜外阻滞:产妇心血管参数、舒适度及新生儿健康状况
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Jan;20(1):7-12. doi: 10.1185/030079903125002649.
3
[General anesthesia or peridural anesthesia in primary cesarean section; a comparative study].
Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol. 1983 Jul-Aug;187(4):194-9.
4
[Effectiveness of obstetric epidural analgesia. II. Caesarean section].
Reg Anaesth. 1982 Oct;5(4):73-7.
5
Neonatal wellbeing after elective caesarean delivery with general, spinal, and epidural anaesthesia.择期剖宫产采用全身麻醉、脊髓麻醉和硬膜外麻醉后的新生儿健康状况。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1993 May;10(3):175-81.
6
[Obstetrical peridural anesthesia with bupivacaine and buprenorphine. A randomized double-blind study in comparison with untreated controls].[布比卡因与丁丙诺啡用于产科硬膜外麻醉。与未治疗对照组相比的随机双盲研究]
Anaesthesist. 1992 Jul;41(7):414-22.
7
[Maternal and neonatal plasma concentrations of bupivacaine during peridural anesthesia for cesarean section].剖宫产硬膜外麻醉期间布比卡因的母体和新生儿血浆浓度
Reg Anaesth. 1990 Aug;13(6):133-7.
8
[Neonatal effects of uterine incision-to-delivery interval during elective cesarean section under epidural anesthesia].[硬膜外麻醉下择期剖宫产术中子宫切开至分娩间隔对新生儿的影响]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 1993 Feb;28(2):67-9, 121.
9
[Epidural anesthesia with carticaine in cesarean section. A comparison with bupivacaine].
Reg Anaesth. 1986 Jul;9(3):79-83.
10
Supplementation of general anaesthesia with tramadol or fentanyl in parturients undergoing elective caesarean section.在接受择期剖宫产的产妇中,用曲马多或芬太尼辅助全身麻醉。
Can J Anaesth. 1998 Jul;45(7):631-4. doi: 10.1007/BF03012091.

引用本文的文献

1
[Recent standards in management of obstetric anesthesia].[产科麻醉管理的最新标准]
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2017 Nov;167(15-16):374-389. doi: 10.1007/s10354-017-0584-0. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
2
Neuraxial blockade for the prevention of postoperative mortality and major morbidity: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews.用于预防术后死亡率和主要并发症的神经轴阻滞:Cochrane系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 25;2014(1):CD010108. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010108.pub2.
3
Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section.
剖宫产的区域麻醉与全身麻醉
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10(10):CD004350. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004350.pub3.
4
National cross sectional survey to determine whether the decision to delivery interval is critical in emergency caesarean section.一项全国性横断面调查,以确定急诊剖宫产中决定分娩间隔是否至关重要。
BMJ. 2004 Mar 20;328(7441):665. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38031.775845.7C. Epub 2004 Mar 15.
5
Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials.硬膜外或脊髓麻醉降低术后死亡率和发病率:随机试验综述结果
BMJ. 2000 Dec 16;321(7275):1493. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7275.1493.