Suppr超能文献

内镜下食管静脉曲张结扎术与注射硬化疗法的比较:一项前瞻性随机试验。

Endoscopic ligation of esophageal varices compared with injection sclerotherapy: a prospective randomized trial.

作者信息

Hashizume M, Ohta M, Ueno K, Tanoue K, Kitano S, Sugimachi K

机构信息

Department of Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 1993 Mar-Apr;39(2):123-6. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(93)70050-4.

Abstract

Fifty cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices underwent endoscopic treatment in a prospective randomized trial carried out to compare variceal ligation with injection sclerotherapy, with respect to safety, efficacy, and complications in the initial session. Twenty-five patients each were treated using endoscopic variceal ligation or endoscopic injection sclerotherapy in the initial session and then only endoscopic injection sclerotherapy for all following sessions. Ligations numbered 4.1 at the initial session. The total number of sessions of endoscopic injection sclerotherapy was 4.0 +/- 1.3 in the endoscopic injection sclerotherapy group compared with 3.6 +/- 1.4 in the endoscopic variceal ligation group. The total volume of the sclerosant used by the end of all the sessions was 23.9 +/- 10.3 ml in the endoscopic variceal ligation group and 39.0 +/- 11.5 ml in the endoscopic injection sclerotherapy group (p < 0.0001). In all patients, complete eradication of the varices was achieved, and at 7 to 15 months follow-up no evidence of recurrence was seen. Adverse effects such as pyrexia, chest pain, and pleural effusion after the initial session were significantly lower in the endoscopic variceal ligation group (p < 0.05), and total bilirubin, serum creatinine, lactate dehydrogenase, and urinary beta 2-microglobulin were significantly increased and PaO2 decreased after endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (p < 0.05). This study shows that endoscopic variceal ligation significantly decreased the adverse effects associated with endoscopic injection sclerotherapy in the initial session, and it is recommended as an alternative to sclerotherapy.

摘要

五十名患有食管静脉曲张的肝硬化患者参与了一项前瞻性随机试验,该试验旨在比较静脉曲张结扎术与注射硬化疗法在首次治疗时的安全性、疗效及并发症情况。首次治疗时,二十五名患者接受内镜下静脉曲张结扎术,另外二十五名患者接受内镜下注射硬化疗法,后续所有疗程均仅采用内镜下注射硬化疗法。首次治疗时结扎次数为4.1次。内镜下注射硬化疗法组内镜下注射硬化疗法的总疗程数为4.0±1.3次,而内镜下静脉曲张结扎术组为3.6±1.4次。所有疗程结束时,内镜下静脉曲张结扎术组使用的硬化剂总量为23.9±10.3毫升,内镜下注射硬化疗法组为39.0±11.5毫升(p<0.0001)。所有患者的静脉曲张均实现完全消除,在7至15个月的随访中未见复发迹象。内镜下静脉曲张结扎术组首次治疗后发热、胸痛和胸腔积液等不良反应明显较少(p<0.05),内镜下注射硬化疗法后总胆红素、血清肌酐、乳酸脱氢酶和尿β2-微球蛋白显著升高,动脉血氧分压降低(p<0.05)。本研究表明,内镜下静脉曲张结扎术在首次治疗时显著降低了与内镜下注射硬化疗法相关的不良反应,建议将其作为硬化疗法的替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验