Suppr超能文献

[阑尾切除术。麦氏切口还是腹腔镜手术?(100例病例)]

[Appendectomies. Mac Burney or laparoscopy? (100 cases)].

作者信息

Champault G, Belhassen A, Rizk N, Lauroy J, Vazzana G, Boutelier P

机构信息

Service de Chirurgie Générale et Digestive, Hôpital Jean Verdier, Bondy.

出版信息

J Chir (Paris). 1993 Jan;130(1):5-8.

PMID:8496258
Abstract

The authors have compared their early (50 cases) experience on laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis with a control group treated by open approach. A teaching period is necessary to reduce the converting rate to an open procedure from 22% to 6% p = 0.05 and to obtain an equal median anesthesia time (39 vs 40 mn+/-16) ns). The mean post operative stay for open operation was 5-8 (range 3-23) days and for the laparoscopic route 3.3 (range 1-8) days (p < 0.005). The wound infection rate was 16% (n = 8) for open/ and 0% for laparoscopic appendectomy p = 0.001. The results suggest that emergency laparoscopic appendectomy should be explored further as an alternative to open surgery for acute appendicitis.

摘要

作者将他们早期(50例)急性阑尾炎腹腔镜阑尾切除术的经验与采用开放手术治疗的对照组进行了比较。需要一个教学阶段,以将转为开放手术的比例从22%降至6%(p = 0.05),并使中位麻醉时间相等(39对40分钟±16)(无显著差异)。开放手术的平均术后住院时间为5 - 8天(范围3 - 23天),腹腔镜手术为3.3天(范围1 - 8天)(p < 0.005)。开放手术的伤口感染率为16%(n = 8),腹腔镜阑尾切除术为0%(p = 0.001)。结果表明,作为急性阑尾炎开放手术的替代方法,急诊腹腔镜阑尾切除术应进一步探索。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验