Matzkin H, Rangel M C, Soloway M S
Department of Urology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Florida.
Urology. 1993 Feb;41(2):144-8. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(93)90167-9.
Patients with Stage D2 prostate cancer relapsing on endocrine treatment have a grim prognosis. The role of a second-line hormonal treatment is debatable. We analyzed retrospectively, response and survival among 119 men (57 black, 62 white) progressing on a variety of first-line hormonal therapy. Sixty-one received a second-line hormonal treatment. Fifty-eight received only supportive therapy after first line therapy was discontinued. Age and race were not a factor in survival. Based on this retrospective study the optimal management for progressive metastatic prostate cancer cannot be delineated. However, the best results were in patients treated with diethylstilbestrol (DES) as a single treatment or when employed as either first or second treatment in patients receiving two therapies. The other modalities, e.g., bilateral orchiectomy, LH-RH analogues, and anti-androgens resulted in comparable outcomes when used either as single treatment or in combinations. Further clarification of the trends shown in this report require randomized controlled studies.
接受内分泌治疗后复发的D2期前列腺癌患者预后不佳。二线激素治疗的作用存在争议。我们回顾性分析了119名男性(57名黑人,62名白人)在多种一线激素治疗中病情进展后的反应和生存情况。61人接受了二线激素治疗。58人在一线治疗停止后仅接受了支持性治疗。年龄和种族不是生存的影响因素。基于这项回顾性研究,无法确定进展期转移性前列腺癌的最佳治疗方案。然而,接受己烯雌酚(DES)单一治疗或在接受两种治疗的患者中作为首次或第二次治疗时,效果最佳。其他治疗方式,如双侧睾丸切除术、促性腺激素释放激素(LH-RH)类似物和抗雄激素药物,无论是单一治疗还是联合使用,都产生了相似的结果。本报告中显示的趋势需要通过随机对照研究进一步阐明。