• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Religious advance directives: the convergence of law, religion, medicine, and public health.宗教预先指示:法律、宗教、医学与公共卫生的交汇
Am J Public Health. 1993 Jun;83(6):899-903. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.6.899.
2
Living and dying in the Jewish way: secular rights and religious duties.以犹太方式生与死:世俗权利与宗教义务。
Death Stud. 1993 May-Jun;17(3):267-76. doi: 10.1080/07481189308252622.
3
Religious traditions and public policy.宗教传统与公共政策。
Assia Jew Med Ethics. 1988 May;1(1):17-24.
4
Making health care decisions for others.为他人做出医疗保健决策。
Ethics Medics. 1997 Jun;22(6):1-3.
5
Culture wars in New York state: ongoing political resistance by religious groups to the Family Health Care Decisions Act.纽约州的文化冲突:宗教团体对《家庭医疗保健决策法案》持续进行的政治抵制。
Christ Bioeth. 2002 Apr;8(1):9-24. doi: 10.1076/chbi.8.1.9.8758.
6
Patient self-determination and the artificial prolongation of life.患者的自我决定权与生命的人工延长
Health Soc Work. 1994 Nov;19(4):245-52. doi: 10.1093/hsw/19.4.245.
7
Decisions at the end of life. Guided by communities of patients.临终决策。由患者群体引导。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1993 Sep-Oct;23(5):6-14.
8
Choosing life after death: respecting religious beliefs and moral convictions in near death decisions.在濒死决策中选择死后重生:尊重宗教信仰与道德信念
Syracuse Law Rev. 1988;39(4):1197-260.
9
Reflections on the offspring's ethical role in decisions for incompetent patients: a response to Sonnenblick, Friedlander, and Steinberg.关于后代在无行为能力患者决策中伦理角色的思考:对索南布利克、弗里德兰德和斯坦伯格的回应
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1993 Jun;41(6):684-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1993.tb06746.x.
10
"What the patient wants…": Lay attitudes towards end-of-life decisions in Germany and Israel.“患者想要的……”:德国和以色列民众对临终决策的态度
Med Health Care Philos. 2015 Aug;18(3):329-40. doi: 10.1007/s11019-014-9606-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Disparities in Palliative and Hospice Care and Completion of Advance Care Planning and Directives Among Non-Hispanic Blacks: A Scoping Review of Recent Literature.非西班牙裔黑人在姑息治疗和临终关怀以及预先护理计划和指示完成方面的差异:近期文献的范围综述
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021 Jun;38(6):688-718. doi: 10.1177/1049909120966585. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
2
Pathways from religion to advance care planning: beliefs about control over length of life and end-of-life values.宗教与预先医疗照护计划的关联途径:对寿命掌控和临终价值观的信念。
Gerontologist. 2013 Oct;53(5):801-16. doi: 10.1093/geront/gns128. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
3
The world's major religions' points of view on end-of-life decisions in the intensive care unit.世界主要宗教对重症监护病房临终决策的观点。
Intensive Care Med. 2008 Mar;34(3):423-30. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0973-8. Epub 2007 Dec 19.
4
Patient perspectives on spirituality and the patient-physician relationship.患者对灵性及医患关系的看法。
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Oct;16(10):685-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.01034.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Brain death, religious freedom, and public policy: New Jersey's landmark legislative initiative.脑死亡、宗教自由与公共政策:新泽西州具有里程碑意义的立法举措
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1991 Dec;1(4):275-92. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0068.
2
Bioethics: secular philosophy, Jewish law and modern medicine.生物伦理学:世俗哲学、犹太律法与现代医学。
Isr J Med Sci. 1989 Jul;25(7):404-9.
3
The health care proxy and the living will.医疗保健代理人与生前预嘱。
N Engl J Med. 1991 Apr 25;324(17):1210-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199104253241711.
4
Limitations of listing specific medical interventions in advance directives.预先指示中列出特定医疗干预措施的局限性。
JAMA. 1991 Aug 14;266(6):825-8.

宗教预先指示:法律、宗教、医学与公共卫生的交汇

Religious advance directives: the convergence of law, religion, medicine, and public health.

作者信息

Grodin M A

机构信息

Law, Medicine, and Ethics Program, Boston University School of Public Health, School of Medicine, MA 02118-2394.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 1993 Jun;83(6):899-903. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.6.899.

DOI:10.2105/ajph.83.6.899
PMID:8498633
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1694725/
Abstract

Because of the deep interpersonal significance of decisions made at the end of life, it is not surprising that religion has played an important role in patient and family decision making. Specific religious concerns about death and dying have led to religious advance directives. Advance directives offer a case study of models of interaction between religious communities and secular institutions. This paper examines why such directives have been created and how they may affect health care decisions. An analysis of their strengths and weaknesses concludes that specific religious instructions are unnecessary in written directives and may undermine both the religious and health care goals of patients.

摘要

由于临终时所做决定具有深刻的人际意义,宗教在患者及其家属的决策过程中发挥重要作用也就不足为奇了。对死亡和临终的特定宗教关切催生了宗教预先指示。预先指示为宗教团体与世俗机构之间的互动模式提供了一个案例研究。本文探讨了此类指示产生的原因以及它们可能如何影响医疗保健决策。对其优缺点的分析得出结论,书面指示中无需包含特定宗教教义,且此类教义可能会损害患者的宗教目标和医疗保健目标。