Trueswell J C, Tanenhaus M K, Kello C
Department of Psychology, University of Rochester, New York 14627.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1993 May;19(3):528-53. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.19.3.528.
Immediate effects of verb-specific syntactic (subcategorization) information were found in a cross-modal naming experiment, a self-paced reading experiment, and an experiment in which eye movements were monitored. In the reading studies, syntactic misanalysis effects in sentence complements (e.g., "The student forgot the solution was...") occurred at the verb in the complement (e.g., was) for matrix verbs typically used with noun phrase complements but not for verbs typically used with sentence complements. In addition, a complementizer effect for sentence-complement-biased verbs was not due to syntactic misanalysis but was correlated with how strongly a particular verb prefers to be followed by the complementizer that. The results support models that make immediate use of lexically specific constraints, especially constraint-based models, but are problematic for lexical filtering models.
在一项跨模态命名实验、一项自定步速阅读实验以及一项监测眼动的实验中,发现了动词特定句法(次范畴化)信息的即时效应。在阅读研究中,句子补足语中的句法错误分析效应(例如,“The student forgot the solution was...”)出现在补足语中的动词(例如,was)上,对于通常与名词短语补足语搭配使用的主句动词而言会出现这种情况,但对于通常与句子补足语搭配使用的动词则不会出现。此外,句子补足语偏向动词的补语化效应并非由于句法错误分析,而是与特定动词对补语词that的偏好程度相关。这些结果支持了那些即时利用词汇特定限制的模型,尤其是基于限制的模型,但对词汇过滤模型来说存在问题。