• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

句法剖析中动词信息的运用:来自眼动和逐词自定步速阅读的证据。

Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading.

作者信息

Ferreira F, Henderson J M

机构信息

University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1990 Jul;16(4):555-68. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.16.4.555.

DOI:10.1037//0278-7393.16.4.555
PMID:2142952
Abstract

We investigated whether readers use verb information to aid in their initial parsing of temporarily ambiguous sentences. In the first experiment, subjects' eye movements were recorded. In the second and third experiments, subjects read sentences by using a noncumulative and cumulative word-by-word self-paced paradigm, respectively. The results of the first two experiments supported Frazier and Rayner's (1982) garden-path model of sentence comprehension: Verb information did not influence the initial operation of the parser. The third experiment indicated that the cumulative version of the self-paced paradigm is not appropriate for studying on-line parsing. We conclude that verb information is not used by the parser to modify its initial parsing strategies, although it may be used to guide subsequent reanalysis.

摘要

我们研究了读者是否会利用动词信息来辅助他们对临时歧义句的初始句法分析。在第一个实验中,记录了受试者的眼动情况。在第二个和第三个实验中,受试者分别使用非累积式和累积式逐词自定步速范式阅读句子。前两个实验的结果支持了弗雷泽和雷纳(1982)的句子理解花园路径模型:动词信息并未影响句法分析器的初始操作。第三个实验表明,自定步速范式的累积版本不适用于研究在线句法分析。我们得出结论,句法分析器不会利用动词信息来修改其初始句法分析策略,尽管动词信息可能会被用于指导后续的重新分析。

相似文献

1
Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading.句法剖析中动词信息的运用:来自眼动和逐词自定步速阅读的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1990 Jul;16(4):555-68. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.16.4.555.
2
Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of syntactic priming in sentence comprehension.句子理解中句法启动的电生理和行为学证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Jan;35(1):19-45. doi: 10.1037/a0013984.
3
Linguistic focus affects eye movements during reading.语言焦点会影响阅读过程中的眼球运动。
Mem Cognit. 1997 Sep;25(5):653-60. doi: 10.3758/bf03211306.
4
Processing coordinate structures in Chinese: evidence from eye movements.中文坐标结构的加工:来自眼动的证据。
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35517. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035517. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
5
Phonological typicality does not influence fixation durations in normal reading.语音典型性不影响正常阅读中的注视时长。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 May;35(3):806-14. doi: 10.1037/a0015123.
6
Discourse influences during parsing are delayed.解析过程中的语篇影响会延迟。
Cognition. 1992 Nov;45(2):109-39. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90026-e.
7
Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths.句子处理中特定动词的限制:区分词汇偏好与花园路径效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1993 May;19(3):528-53. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.19.3.528.
8
Why reread? Evidence from garden-path and local coherence structures.为何要重读?来自花园小径和局部连贯结构的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Jul;70(7):1380-1405. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1186200. Epub 2016 May 25.
9
The time course of semantic and syntactic processing in Chinese sentence comprehension: evidence from eye movements.中文句子理解中语义和句法加工的时间进程:来自眼动的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2009 Dec;37(8):1164-76. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.8.1164.
10
Processing of Arabic diacritical marks: phonological-syntactic disambiguation of homographic verbs and visual crowding effects.阿拉伯语变音符的处理:同形动词的音系-句法消歧与视觉拥挤效应
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Apr;41(2):494-507. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000032. Epub 2015 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
L2 Arabic learners' processing of Arabic garden-path sentences: a consistent reading pattern.阿拉伯语二语学习者对阿拉伯语花园小径句的加工:一种一致的阅读模式。
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 8;15:1333112. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1333112. eCollection 2024.
2
Strategic Pauses Relieve Listeners from the Effort of Listening to Fast Speech: Data Limited and Resource Limited Processes in Narrative Recall by Adult Users of Cochlear Implants.策略停顿可减轻听众在快速言语聆听时的努力:人工耳蜗植入成人使用者在叙事回忆中的数据限制和资源限制过程。
Trends Hear. 2023 Jan-Dec;27:23312165231203514. doi: 10.1177/23312165231203514.
3
Access to verb bias and plausibility information during syntactic processing in adult Spanish-English bilinguals.
成年西班牙语-英语双语者在句法处理过程中对动词偏向和合理性信息的获取。
Biling (Camb Engl). 2022 May;25(3):417-429. doi: 10.1017/s1366728921000924. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
4
Cognitive control mechanisms in language processing: are there both within- and across-task conflict adaptation effects?语言加工中的认知控制机制:是否存在任务内和任务间冲突适应效应?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Mar;76(3):649-671. doi: 10.1177/17470218221111789. Epub 2022 Sep 18.
5
L2 Learners Do Not Ignore Verb's Subcategorization Information in Real-Time Syntactic Processing.二语学习者在实时句法处理中不会忽略动词的次范畴化信息。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 20;12:689137. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.689137. eCollection 2021.
6
Review on Eye-Hand Span in Sight-Reading of Music.音乐视奏中眼手跨度的综述
J Eye Mov Res. 2021 Nov 11;14(4). doi: 10.16910/jemr.14.4.4. eCollection 2021.
7
The use of context in resolving syntactic ambiguity: Structural and semantic influences.语境在解决句法歧义中的作用:结构和语义影响
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2020;35(1):43-57. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2019.1622750. Epub 2019 May 27.
8
Deficits in the Use of Verb Bias Information in Real-Time Processing by College Students With Developmental Language Disorder.患有发育性语言障碍的大学生在实时处理中动词偏向信息使用方面的缺陷。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Feb 26;62(2):337-355. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-17-0267.
9
"A cruel king" is not the same as "a king who is cruel": Modifier position affects how words are encoded and retrieved from memory.“残忍的国王”与“残忍的国王”并不相同:修饰语的位置会影响单词在记忆中的编码和解码方式。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Nov;45(11):2010-2035. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000694. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
10
Eye-Tracking and Corpus-Based Analyses of Syntax-Semantics Interactions in Complement Coercion.补语强制中句法-语义交互的眼动追踪与基于语料库的分析
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2016;31(7):921-939. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1183798. Epub 2016 May 19.