• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估精神药物的双盲设计有多可靠?

How sound is the double-blind design for evaluating psychotropic drugs?

作者信息

Fisher S, Greenberg R P

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, State University of New York Health Science Center, Syracuse 13210.

出版信息

J Nerv Ment Dis. 1993 Jun;181(6):345-50. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199306000-00002.

DOI:10.1097/00005053-199306000-00002
PMID:8501455
Abstract

Sufficient data have accumulated to raise serious doubts about the integrity of the double-blind design that is presumed to shield psychotropic drug trials from bias and expectations. A major deficit in most drug trials has been the use of inert rather than active placebos. The deficiencies of the double-blind paradigm call for a questioning stance with respect to previous studies of psychotropic drug efficacy. Various possible ways of strengthening the double-blind paradigm are reviewed.

摘要

已有足够的数据积累,令人对双盲设计的完整性产生严重怀疑,双盲设计本应使精神药物试验免受偏差和预期的影响。大多数药物试验的一个主要缺陷是使用了无活性而非有活性的安慰剂。双盲范式的缺陷要求对先前关于精神药物疗效的研究采取质疑的态度。本文回顾了加强双盲范式的各种可能方法。

相似文献

1
How sound is the double-blind design for evaluating psychotropic drugs?评估精神药物的双盲设计有多可靠?
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1993 Jun;181(6):345-50. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199306000-00002.
2
Placebo use in clinical trials on psychotropic drugs in France.法国精神药物临床试验中的安慰剂使用情况。
Neuropsychobiology. 1983;9(1):20-5. doi: 10.1159/000117931.
3
Placebo effect of psychotropic drugs on patients and staff.精神药物对患者及医护人员的安慰剂效应。
Rev Neuropsychiatr Infant. 1977 May-Jun;25(5-6):329-33.
4
Placebos, drug effects, and study design: a clinician's guide.安慰剂、药物效应与研究设计:临床医生指南
Am J Psychiatry. 1999 Jun;156(6):829-36. doi: 10.1176/ajp.156.6.829.
5
The necessity of placebo application in psychotropic drug trials.安慰剂在精神药物试验中的应用必要性。
Pharmacopsychiatry. 1990 Sep;23(5):203-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1014508.
6
[Comparison of the results of treatment of neuroses with psychotropic drugs and placebo].
Psychiatr Pol. 1982;16(4):267-72.
7
[Principles and regulations for clinical pilot studies on psycholeptic drugs (author's transl)].抗精神病药物临床试点研究的原则与规定(作者译)
Arzneimittelforschung. 1978;28(8):1257-9.
8
[Difficulties of a clinician in planning psychopharmacological trials (author's transl)].临床医生在规划精神药理学试验中的困难(作者译)
Pharmakopsychiatr Neuropsychopharmakol. 1977 May;10(3):140-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1094531.
9
Designing drug efficacy trials in the treatment of cocaine abuse.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1991 Feb;179(2):89-96. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199102000-00005.
10
[Effectiveness of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and psychotropic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis].
Ter Arkh. 1984;56(11):77-81.

引用本文的文献

1
Methods to address functional unblinding of raters in CNS trials.解决中枢神经系统试验中评估者功能揭盲的方法。
Transl Psychiatry. 2025 Feb 7;15(1):47. doi: 10.1038/s41398-025-03262-1.
2
Great Expectations: recommendations for improving the methodological rigor of psychedelic clinical trials.高期望:改善迷幻药临床试验方法严谨性的建议。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2022 Jun;239(6):1989-2010. doi: 10.1007/s00213-022-06123-7. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
3
Placebo and Side Effects Confound Clinical Trials on New Antitussives.安慰剂和副作用使新型镇咳药临床试验复杂化。
Lung. 2021 Aug;199(4):319-326. doi: 10.1007/s00408-021-00458-2. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
4
Comparative efficacy of placebos in short-term antidepressant trials for major depression: a secondary meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials.短期抗抑郁治疗中安慰剂对重度抑郁症的疗效比较:安慰剂对照试验的二次荟萃分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 7;20(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02839-y.
5
Benefits and harms of antipsychotic drugs in drug-naïve patients with psychosis: A systematic review.初治精神病患者使用抗精神病药物的获益与危害:一项系统评价。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2019;30(4):193-201. doi: 10.3233/JRS-195063.
6
Guidelines for the pharmacological acute treatment of major depression: conflicts with current evidence as demonstrated with the German S3-guidelines.抗抑郁药治疗急性重度抑郁症的指南:与当前证据的冲突——以德国 S3 指南为例。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Sep 2;19(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2230-4.
7
Considering benefits and harms of duloxetine for treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a meta-analysis of clinical study reports.度洛西汀治疗压力性尿失禁的利弊分析:临床研究报告的荟萃分析
CMAJ. 2017 Feb 6;189(5):E194-E203. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.151104. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
8
Antidepressants: misnamed and misrepresented.抗抑郁药:名称不当且表述有误。
World Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;14(3):302-3. doi: 10.1002/wps.20243.
9
Blinded Outcome Assessment Was Infrequently Used and Poorly Reported in Open Trials.在开放试验中,盲法结局评估很少被使用且报告不佳。
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 29;10(6):e0131926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131926. eCollection 2015.
10
Varenicline effects on craving, cue reactivity, and smoking reward.伐伦克林对渴求、线索反应和吸烟奖赏的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2011 Nov;218(2):391-403. doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2327-z. Epub 2011 May 11.