• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丁丙诺啡与美沙酮维持治疗阿片类药物依赖的比较。

Buprenorphine versus methadone maintenance for opioid dependence.

作者信息

Kosten T R, Schottenfeld R, Ziedonis D, Falcioni J

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06519.

出版信息

J Nerv Ment Dis. 1993 Jun;181(6):358-64. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199306000-00004.

DOI:10.1097/00005053-199306000-00004
PMID:8501457
Abstract

Buprenorphine at 2 mg and 6 mg daily was compared with methadone at 35 mg and 65 mg during 24 weeks of maintenance among 125 opioid-dependent patients. As hypothesized, 6 mg of buprenorphine were superior to 2 mg of buprenorphine in reducing illicit opioid use, but higher dosage did not improve treatment retention. Self-reported illicit opioid use declined substantially in all groups, but by the third month, significantly more heroin abuse was reported at 2 mg than at 6 mg of buprenorphine or of methadone. From an initial average of $1860/month, month 3 usage dropped to $41 (methadone 65 mg), $73 (methadone 35 mg), $118 (buprenorphine 6 mg), and $351/month (buprenorphine 2 mg). Days of use also dropped from 29 days to 1.7 (methadone 65 mg), 2.8 (methadone 35 mg), 4.0 (buprenorphine 6 mg), and 6.6 days/month (buprenorphine 2 mg). This relatively low efficacy for 2 mg of buprenorphine persisted through month 6 of the trial, with 7.2 days/month and $235/month of use for buprenorphine at 2 mg versus 1.9 days/month and $65/month for the other three groups. Increased opioid abuse also was associated with significantly greater and persistent opioid withdrawal symptoms. Our secondary hypothesis, that buprenorphine would be equivalent to methadone in efficacy, was not supported. Treatment retention was significantly better on methadone (20 vs. 16 weeks), and methadone patients had significantly more opioid-free urines (51% vs. 26%). Abstinence for at least 3 weeks was also more common on methadone than buprenorphine (65% vs. 27%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

在125名阿片类药物依赖患者的24周维持治疗期间,对每日服用2毫克和6毫克丁丙诺啡与服用35毫克和65毫克美沙酮进行了比较。正如所假设的,6毫克丁丙诺啡在减少非法阿片类药物使用方面优于2毫克丁丙诺啡,但更高剂量并未改善治疗依从性。所有组中自我报告的非法阿片类药物使用均大幅下降,但到第三个月时,报告称服用2毫克丁丙诺啡的患者中,海洛因滥用情况明显多于服用6毫克丁丙诺啡或美沙酮的患者。从最初平均每月1860美元,到第三个月时,药物使用费用降至41美元(65毫克美沙酮)、73美元(35毫克美沙酮)、118美元(6毫克丁丙诺啡)和351美元/月(2毫克丁丙诺啡)。使用天数也从29天降至1.7天(65毫克美沙酮)、2.8天(35毫克美沙酮)、4.0天(6毫克丁丙诺啡)和6.6天/月(2毫克丁丙诺啡)。2毫克丁丙诺啡的这种相对较低疗效在试验的第6个月仍持续存在,2毫克丁丙诺啡的使用为7.2天/月和235美元/月,而其他三组分别为1.9天/月和65美元/月。阿片类药物滥用增加也与明显更严重且持续的阿片类药物戒断症状相关。我们的次要假设,即丁丙诺啡在疗效上等同于美沙酮,未得到支持。美沙酮治疗的依从性明显更好(20周对16周),美沙酮治疗的患者无阿片类药物尿液检测呈阳性的比例明显更高(51%对26%)。美沙酮治疗组中至少连续3周禁欲的情况也比丁丙诺啡治疗组更常见(65%对27%)。(摘要截选至250字)

相似文献

1
Buprenorphine versus methadone maintenance for opioid dependence.丁丙诺啡与美沙酮维持治疗阿片类药物依赖的比较。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1993 Jun;181(6):358-64. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199306000-00004.
2
A controlled trial comparing buprenorphine and methadone maintenance in opioid dependence.一项比较丁丙诺啡和美沙酮维持疗法治疗阿片类药物依赖的对照试验。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1996 May;53(5):401-7. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830050035005.
3
Buprenorphine versus methadone in the treatment of opioid dependence: self-reports, urinalysis, and addiction severity index.丁丙诺啡与美沙酮治疗阿片类药物依赖的比较:自我报告、尿液分析及成瘾严重程度指数
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1996 Feb;16(1):58-67. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199602000-00010.
4
Buprenorphine vs methadone maintenance treatment for concurrent opioid dependence and cocaine abuse.丁丙诺啡与美沙酮维持治疗对同时存在阿片类药物依赖和可卡因滥用的疗效比较
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1997 Aug;54(8):713-20. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830200041006.
5
Buprenorphine versus methadone maintenance therapy: a randomized double-blind trial with 405 opioid-dependent patients.丁丙诺啡与美沙酮维持治疗:一项针对405名阿片类药物依赖患者的随机双盲试验。
Addiction. 2003 Apr;98(4):441-52. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00335.x.
6
A controlled trial of buprenorphine treatment for opioid dependence.丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类药物依赖的对照试验。
JAMA. 1992 May 27;267(20):2750-5.
7
Desipramine in opioid-dependent cocaine abusers maintained on buprenorphine vs methadone.在使用丁丙诺啡或美沙酮维持治疗的阿片类药物依赖可卡因滥用者中使用去甲丙咪嗪的情况
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999 Sep;56(9):812-20. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.56.9.812.
8
A stepped care strategy using buprenorphine and methadone versus conventional methadone maintenance in heroin dependence: a randomized controlled trial.一项使用丁丙诺啡和美沙酮的阶梯式护理策略与传统美沙酮维持治疗对海洛因依赖的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Psychiatry. 2007 May;164(5):797-803. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2007.164.5.797.
9
Buprenorphine versus methadone for opioid dependence: predictor variables for treatment outcome.丁丙诺啡与美沙酮治疗阿片类药物依赖:治疗结果的预测变量
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004 Jul 15;75(1):37-45. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2003.11.017.
10
Opioid detoxification with buprenorphine, clonidine, or methadone in hospitalized heroin-dependent patients with HIV infection.在住院的感染HIV的海洛因依赖患者中使用丁丙诺啡、可乐定或美沙酮进行阿片类药物脱毒治疗。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2003 Apr 1;69(3):263-72. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(02)00325-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Oral and injectable opioid agonist treatments for people who use street opioids: a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis.针对使用街头阿片类药物人群的口服和注射用阿片类激动剂治疗:一项系统文献综述和网状Meta分析
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 30;25(1):2974. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24365-w.
2
Empirically contrasting urine drug screening-based opioid use disorder treatment outcome definitions.基于尿液药物筛查的阿片类药物使用障碍治疗结果定义的实证对比。
Addiction. 2024 Jul;119(7):1289-1300. doi: 10.1111/add.16494. Epub 2024 Apr 14.
3
Sex differences in cocaine self-administration by Wistar rats after predator odor exposure.
暴露于捕食者气味后Wistar大鼠可卡因自我给药的性别差异。
Adv Drug Alcohol Res. 2023;3. doi: 10.3389/adar.2023.11245. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
4
Relative effectiveness of medications for opioid-related disorders: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.阿片类相关障碍药物的相对疗效:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 31;17(3):e0266142. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266142. eCollection 2022.
5
Advancing Pharmacological Treatments for Opioid Use Disorder (ADaPT-OUD): an Implementation Trial in Eight Veterans Health Administration Facilities.推进阿片类物质使用障碍的药物治疗(ADaPT - OUD):在八个退伍军人健康管理局设施中进行的一项实施试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Nov;37(14):3594-3602. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07274-7. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
6
Retention in opioid agonist treatment: a rapid review and meta-analysis comparing observational studies and randomized controlled trials.阿片类激动剂治疗的维持:观察性研究和随机对照试验比较的快速综述和荟萃分析。
Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 6;10(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01764-9.
7
Diversity inclusion in United States opioid pharmacological treatment trials: A systematic review.美国阿片类药物药理治疗试验中的多样性包容:系统评价。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2021 Oct;29(5):524-538. doi: 10.1037/pha0000510. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
8
A call for consensus in defining efficacy in clinical trials for opioid addiction: combined results from a systematic review and qualitative study in patients receiving pharmacological assisted therapy for opioid use disorder.呼吁在阿片类药物成瘾临床试验中定义疗效的共识:接受药物辅助治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的患者进行系统评价和定性研究的综合结果。
Trials. 2020 Jan 6;21(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3995-y.
9
Advancing pharmacological treatments for opioid use disorder (ADaPT-OUD): protocol for testing a novel strategy to improve implementation of medication-assisted treatment for veterans with opioid use disorders in low-performing facilities.推进阿片类药物使用障碍的药理学治疗(ADaPT-OUD):在表现不佳的机构中为患有阿片类药物使用障碍的退伍军人改善药物辅助治疗实施的新策略的测试方案。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2018 Dec 13;13(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13722-018-0127-z.
10
Buprenorphine/Naloxone Maintenance Therapy: an Observational Retrospective Report on the Effect of Dose on 18 months Retention in an Office-Based Treatment Program.丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮维持治疗:关于剂量对门诊治疗项目中18个月留存率影响的观察性回顾报告
Subst Abuse. 2017 Oct 4;11:1178221817731320. doi: 10.1177/1178221817731320. eCollection 2017.