Kosten T R, Schottenfeld R, Ziedonis D, Falcioni J
Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06519.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1993 Jun;181(6):358-64. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199306000-00004.
Buprenorphine at 2 mg and 6 mg daily was compared with methadone at 35 mg and 65 mg during 24 weeks of maintenance among 125 opioid-dependent patients. As hypothesized, 6 mg of buprenorphine were superior to 2 mg of buprenorphine in reducing illicit opioid use, but higher dosage did not improve treatment retention. Self-reported illicit opioid use declined substantially in all groups, but by the third month, significantly more heroin abuse was reported at 2 mg than at 6 mg of buprenorphine or of methadone. From an initial average of $1860/month, month 3 usage dropped to $41 (methadone 65 mg), $73 (methadone 35 mg), $118 (buprenorphine 6 mg), and $351/month (buprenorphine 2 mg). Days of use also dropped from 29 days to 1.7 (methadone 65 mg), 2.8 (methadone 35 mg), 4.0 (buprenorphine 6 mg), and 6.6 days/month (buprenorphine 2 mg). This relatively low efficacy for 2 mg of buprenorphine persisted through month 6 of the trial, with 7.2 days/month and $235/month of use for buprenorphine at 2 mg versus 1.9 days/month and $65/month for the other three groups. Increased opioid abuse also was associated with significantly greater and persistent opioid withdrawal symptoms. Our secondary hypothesis, that buprenorphine would be equivalent to methadone in efficacy, was not supported. Treatment retention was significantly better on methadone (20 vs. 16 weeks), and methadone patients had significantly more opioid-free urines (51% vs. 26%). Abstinence for at least 3 weeks was also more common on methadone than buprenorphine (65% vs. 27%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在125名阿片类药物依赖患者的24周维持治疗期间,对每日服用2毫克和6毫克丁丙诺啡与服用35毫克和65毫克美沙酮进行了比较。正如所假设的,6毫克丁丙诺啡在减少非法阿片类药物使用方面优于2毫克丁丙诺啡,但更高剂量并未改善治疗依从性。所有组中自我报告的非法阿片类药物使用均大幅下降,但到第三个月时,报告称服用2毫克丁丙诺啡的患者中,海洛因滥用情况明显多于服用6毫克丁丙诺啡或美沙酮的患者。从最初平均每月1860美元,到第三个月时,药物使用费用降至41美元(65毫克美沙酮)、73美元(35毫克美沙酮)、118美元(6毫克丁丙诺啡)和351美元/月(2毫克丁丙诺啡)。使用天数也从29天降至1.7天(65毫克美沙酮)、2.8天(35毫克美沙酮)、4.0天(6毫克丁丙诺啡)和6.6天/月(2毫克丁丙诺啡)。2毫克丁丙诺啡的这种相对较低疗效在试验的第6个月仍持续存在,2毫克丁丙诺啡的使用为7.2天/月和235美元/月,而其他三组分别为1.9天/月和65美元/月。阿片类药物滥用增加也与明显更严重且持续的阿片类药物戒断症状相关。我们的次要假设,即丁丙诺啡在疗效上等同于美沙酮,未得到支持。美沙酮治疗的依从性明显更好(20周对16周),美沙酮治疗的患者无阿片类药物尿液检测呈阳性的比例明显更高(51%对26%)。美沙酮治疗组中至少连续3周禁欲的情况也比丁丙诺啡治疗组更常见(65%对27%)。(摘要截选至250字)