• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项比较丁丙诺啡和美沙酮维持疗法治疗阿片类药物依赖的对照试验。

A controlled trial comparing buprenorphine and methadone maintenance in opioid dependence.

作者信息

Ling W, Wesson D R, Charuvastra C, Klett C J

机构信息

Los Angeles Addiction Treatment Research Center, Calif., USA.

出版信息

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1996 May;53(5):401-7. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830050035005.

DOI:10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830050035005
PMID:8624183
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Buprenorphine is a partial agonist at the mu-opioid receptor that has been proposed as an alternative to traditional full agonist maintenance therapy for the treatment of opioid addiction. We report on a clinical trial in which the relative safety and efficacy of long-term fixed-dose buprenorphine maintenance was examined in comparison to low- and high-dose methadone maintenance.

METHODS

Two hundred twenty-five treatment-seeking opioid addicts (46 women, 179 men) were randomly assigned to receive, in a double-blind manner, either 8 mg/d of buprenorphine, 30 mg/d of methadone, or 80 mg/d of methadone maintenance over a 1-year period. Objective and subjective measures of efficacy (urine toxicology, retention, craving, and withdrawal symptoms) were examined at the study midpoint and at termination, and safety data were tabulated over the entire 52-week study period.

RESULTS

Patients assigned to high-dose methadone maintenance performed significantly better on measures of retention, opioid use, and opioid craving than either the low-dose methadone or the buprenorphine group at both 26-week and 52-week time points. Performance on these measures was virtually identical between the latter two groups. No serious adverse health effects attributable to buprenorphine were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Buprenorphine maintenance at 8 mg/d appears to be less than optimally efficacious under the conditions of the present study. Continued research is needed to reconcile these findings with the more positive results reported by other investigative groups. There are no apparent health risks associated with long-term buprenorphine maintenance at this dosage.

摘要

背景

丁丙诺啡是μ-阿片受体的部分激动剂,已被提议作为传统全激动剂维持疗法治疗阿片类药物成瘾的替代方案。我们报告了一项临床试验,比较了长期固定剂量丁丙诺啡维持治疗与低剂量和高剂量美沙酮维持治疗的相对安全性和有效性。

方法

225名寻求治疗的阿片类药物成瘾者(46名女性,179名男性)被随机双盲分配,在1年的时间里接受每日8毫克丁丙诺啡、每日30毫克美沙酮或每日80毫克美沙酮维持治疗。在研究中点和结束时检查疗效的客观和主观指标(尿液毒理学、戒断率、渴望和戒断症状),并在整个52周的研究期间将安全数据制成表格。

结果

在26周和52周时间点,接受高剂量美沙酮维持治疗的患者在戒断率、阿片类药物使用和阿片类药物渴望指标上的表现明显优于低剂量美沙酮组或丁丙诺啡组。后两组在这些指标上的表现几乎相同。未观察到与丁丙诺啡相关的严重不良健康影响。

结论

在本研究条件下,每日8毫克丁丙诺啡维持治疗的疗效似乎未达最佳。需要继续研究,以将这些结果与其他研究小组报告的更积极结果相协调。该剂量的丁丙诺啡长期维持治疗没有明显的健康风险。

相似文献

1
A controlled trial comparing buprenorphine and methadone maintenance in opioid dependence.一项比较丁丙诺啡和美沙酮维持疗法治疗阿片类药物依赖的对照试验。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1996 May;53(5):401-7. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830050035005.
2
Buprenorphine vs methadone maintenance treatment for concurrent opioid dependence and cocaine abuse.丁丙诺啡与美沙酮维持治疗对同时存在阿片类药物依赖和可卡因滥用的疗效比较
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1997 Aug;54(8):713-20. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830200041006.
3
Buprenorphine versus methadone maintenance for opioid dependence.丁丙诺啡与美沙酮维持治疗阿片类药物依赖的比较。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1993 Jun;181(6):358-64. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199306000-00004.
4
Buprenorphine versus methadone in the treatment of opioid dependence: self-reports, urinalysis, and addiction severity index.丁丙诺啡与美沙酮治疗阿片类药物依赖的比较:自我报告、尿液分析及成瘾严重程度指数
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1996 Feb;16(1):58-67. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199602000-00010.
5
A controlled trial of buprenorphine treatment for opioid dependence.丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类药物依赖的对照试验。
JAMA. 1992 May 27;267(20):2750-5.
6
Comparison of buprenorphine and methadone in the treatment of opioid dependence.丁丙诺啡与美沙酮治疗阿片类物质依赖的比较。
Am J Psychiatry. 1994 Jul;151(7):1025-30. doi: 10.1176/ajp.151.7.1025.
7
Double-blind randomized trial of buprenorphine and methadone in opiate dependence.丁丙诺啡与美沙酮治疗阿片类物质依赖的双盲随机试验。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2001 Mar 1;62(1):97-104. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(00)00163-0.
8
A stepped care strategy using buprenorphine and methadone versus conventional methadone maintenance in heroin dependence: a randomized controlled trial.一项使用丁丙诺啡和美沙酮的阶梯式护理策略与传统美沙酮维持治疗对海洛因依赖的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Psychiatry. 2007 May;164(5):797-803. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2007.164.5.797.
9
Buprenorphine versus methadone in the treatment of opioid-dependent cocaine users.丁丙诺啡与美沙酮治疗阿片类药物依赖的可卡因使用者的比较。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1994 Dec;116(4):401-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02247469.
10
[Buprenorphine vs. methadone as maintenance treatment for opioid dependence].[丁丙诺啡与美沙酮作为阿片类药物依赖维持治疗的比较]
Nervenarzt. 1999 Sep;70(9):795-802. doi: 10.1007/s001150050514.

引用本文的文献

1
Oral and injectable opioid agonist treatments for people who use street opioids: a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis.针对使用街头阿片类药物人群的口服和注射用阿片类激动剂治疗:一项系统文献综述和网状Meta分析
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 30;25(1):2974. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24365-w.
2
Janus LAAM-loaded electrospun fibrous buccal films for treating opioid use disorder.用于治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的载有Janus LAAM的电纺纤维颊膜。
Biomaterials. 2025 Jun;317:123041. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2024.123041. Epub 2024 Dec 22.
3
Ecological momentary assessment and cue-elicited drug craving as primary endpoints: study protocol for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial testing the efficacy of a GLP-1 receptor agonist in opioid use disorder.
生态瞬时评估和线索诱发的药物渴求作为主要终点:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验的研究方案,旨在测试 GLP-1 受体激动剂在阿片类药物使用障碍中的疗效。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2024 Jul 27;19(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13722-024-00481-7.
4
Mobile Medication Adherence Platform for Buprenorphine (MAP4BUP): A Phase I feasibility, usability and efficacy pilot randomized clinical trial.美沙酮移动用药依从性平台(MAP4BUP):一项 I 期可行性、可用性和疗效的随机临床试验。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2024 Mar 1;256:111099. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.111099. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
5
Negative Urgency Linked to Craving and Substance Use Among Adults on Buprenorphine or Methadone.阿片类物质依赖者的负性冲动与觅药渴求及使用的关系
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan;51(1):114-122. doi: 10.1007/s11414-023-09845-4. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
6
Influences on advance practice nursing education to prescribe medications for opioid use disorder.影响阿片类药物使用障碍药物处方的高级实践护理教育。
Nurs Outlook. 2023 May-Jun;71(3):101963. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2023.101963. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
7
Opioid agonist treatment for people who are dependent on pharmaceutical opioids.阿片类药物成瘾者的阿片类激动剂治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 5;9(9):CD011117. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011117.pub3.
8
Duration of medication treatment for opioid-use disorder and risk of overdose among Medicaid enrollees in 11 states: a retrospective cohort study.11 个州医疗补助受助人中阿片类药物使用障碍药物治疗持续时间与过量用药风险的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。
Addiction. 2022 Dec;117(12):3079-3088. doi: 10.1111/add.15959. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
9
Relative effectiveness of medications for opioid-related disorders: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.阿片类相关障碍药物的相对疗效:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 31;17(3):e0266142. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266142. eCollection 2022.
10
Advancing Pharmacological Treatments for Opioid Use Disorder (ADaPT-OUD): an Implementation Trial in Eight Veterans Health Administration Facilities.推进阿片类物质使用障碍的药物治疗(ADaPT - OUD):在八个退伍军人健康管理局设施中进行的一项实施试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Nov;37(14):3594-3602. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07274-7. Epub 2022 Jan 3.