Devins G M, Edworthy S M, Seland T P, Klein G M, Paul L C, Mandin H
Clarke Institute of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Canada.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1993 Jun;181(6):377-81. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199306000-00007.
Illness intrusiveness derives from illness-induced lifestyle disruptions that interfere with continued involvements in valued activities and interests and is hypothesized to represent a fundamental determinant of the psychosocial impact of chronic conditions. The present investigation compared reported levels of illness intrusiveness across 305 individuals from three chronically ill populations: rheumatoid arthritis (N = 110), end-stage renal disease (N = 101), and multiple sclerosis (N = 94). Although multiple sclerosis was significantly more intrusive, overall, into lifestyles, activities, and interests as compared with rheumatoid arthritis and end-stage renal disease (which did not differ), a significant illness group x life domain interaction indicated that intrusiveness into eight individual life domains differed significantly across the groups and that the pattern of differences varied as a function of the particular life domain involved. Differences in the constellations of signs, symptoms, and treatment regimens associated with a given condition were hypothesized to account for observed differences in illness intrusiveness.
疾病侵扰源自疾病导致的生活方式中断,这种中断会干扰人们继续参与有价值的活动和兴趣爱好,并且据推测,它代表了慢性病心理社会影响的一个基本决定因素。本研究比较了来自三种慢性病群体的305名个体所报告的疾病侵扰水平:类风湿性关节炎(N = 110)、终末期肾病(N = 101)和多发性硬化症(N = 94)。尽管总体而言,与类风湿性关节炎和终末期肾病(二者无差异)相比,多发性硬化症对生活方式、活动和兴趣的侵扰明显更严重,但显著的疾病组×生活领域交互作用表明,不同组对八个个体生活领域的侵扰存在显著差异,且差异模式因所涉及的特定生活领域而异。与特定疾病相关的体征、症状和治疗方案组合的差异被认为可以解释所观察到的疾病侵扰差异。