• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

宾夕法尼亚州疗养院护理结果的差异。机构与环境相关因素。

Variations in the outcomes of care provided in Pennsylvania nursing homes. Facility and environmental correlates.

作者信息

Zinn J S, Aaronson W E, Rosko M D

机构信息

Department of Health Administration, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.

出版信息

Med Care. 1993 Jun;31(6):475-87. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199306000-00001.

DOI:10.1097/00005650-199306000-00001
PMID:8501995
Abstract

This research study utilizes indicators from federal and state surveys to evaluate variation in outcomes in 438 Medicare certified skilled nursing care facilities in Pennsylvania. First, a standardization function adjusting for patient characteristics known to influence outcomes was developed and estimated. The relationships between organizational and environmental characteristics and the chosen outcome indicators (i.e., differences between the actual and expected rate of mortality, pressure ulcers, urethral catheterization and physical restraints) were then analyzed by weighted least squares regression. Results suggest considerable interfacility variation in rates for these outcome indicators. A portion of this variation is significantly attributable to resident characteristics (P < or = 0.05). However, variation in outcomes in Pennsylvania facilities is also associated with facility characteristics (e.g., size and for-profit status), and environmental characteristics (e.g., per capita income and bed supply). Implications for nursing home management and policy are considered.

摘要

本研究利用联邦和州调查中的指标,对宾夕法尼亚州438家获得医疗保险认证的熟练护理机构的结果差异进行评估。首先,开发并估计了一个针对已知会影响结果的患者特征进行调整的标准化函数。然后,通过加权最小二乘法回归分析组织和环境特征与所选结果指标之间的关系(即实际死亡率与预期死亡率、压疮、尿道插管和身体约束率之间的差异)。结果表明,这些结果指标的发生率在机构间存在相当大的差异。这种差异的一部分可显著归因于居民特征(P≤0.05)。然而,宾夕法尼亚州各机构的结果差异也与机构特征(如规模和营利状况)以及环境特征(如人均收入和床位供应)有关。文中还考虑了对养老院管理和政策的影响。

相似文献

1
Variations in the outcomes of care provided in Pennsylvania nursing homes. Facility and environmental correlates.宾夕法尼亚州疗养院护理结果的差异。机构与环境相关因素。
Med Care. 1993 Jun;31(6):475-87. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199306000-00001.
2
The use of standardized indicators as quality improvement tools: an application in Pennsylvania nursing homes.使用标准化指标作为质量改进工具:宾夕法尼亚州养老院的一项应用
Am J Med Qual. 1993 Summer;8(2):72-8. doi: 10.1177/0885713X9300800209.
3
Comparative data analysis using collaborative skilled nursing/long-term care indicator assessment.使用协作性专业护理/长期护理指标评估进行比较数据分析。
J Healthc Qual. 1998 Jul-Aug;20(4):12-20; quiz 21, 52. doi: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.1998.tb00267.x.
4
Breaking free of restraints.挣脱束缚
Provider. 2002 Jul;28(7):57-60, 62.
5
The OBRA-87 nursing home regulations and implementation of the Resident Assessment Instrument: effects on process quality.《1987年综合预算调节法案》养老院规定及居民评估工具的实施:对过程质量的影响
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997 Aug;45(8):977-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb02970.x.
6
Skin assessment and pressure ulcer care in hospital-based skilled nursing facilities.医院专业护理机构中的皮肤评估与压疮护理
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2003 Jun;49(6):42-4, 46, 48 passim, contd.
7
Strategic groups, performance, and strategic response in the nursing home industry.养老院行业中的战略群组、绩效与战略响应
Health Serv Res. 1994 Jun;29(2):187-205.
8
Residential care facilities: a key sector in the spectrum of long-term care providers in the United States.寄宿护理机构:美国长期护理服务提供商体系中的一个关键领域。
NCHS Data Brief. 2011 Dec(78):1-8.
9
Characteristics of long-term care facilities associated with standing order programs to deliver influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations to residents in 13 states.与13个州向居民提供流感和肺炎球菌疫苗接种的长期医嘱项目相关的长期护理机构的特征
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2005 Mar-Apr;6(2):97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2004.12.020.
10
Implementing an incontinence management protocol in long-term care. Clinical outcomes and costs.
J Gerontol Nurs. 2003 Aug;29(8):46-53. doi: 10.3928/0098-9134-20030801-10.

引用本文的文献

1
Facility ownership and mortality among older adults residing in care homes.养老机构中老年人的设施所有权与死亡率。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 1;14(3):e0197789. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197789. eCollection 2019.
2
Association Between Early Outpatient Visits and Readmissions After Ischemic Stroke.缺血性中风后早期门诊就诊与再入院之间的关联。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Apr;11(4):e004024. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004024.
3
Facility and State Variation in Hip Fracture in U.S. Nursing Home Residents.美国养老院居民髋部骨折的设施和州际差异。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Mar;66(3):539-545. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15264. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
4
Is higher nursing home quality more costly?更高质量的养老院成本更高吗?
Eur J Health Econ. 2016 Nov;17(8):1011-1026. doi: 10.1007/s10198-015-0743-4. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
5
Quality of end-of-life care of long-term nursing home residents with and without dementia.长期居住在养老院的有痴呆症和无痴呆症患者的临终关怀质量。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Jul;61(7):1066-73. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12330. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
6
Skilled nursing facility referral and hospital readmission rates after heart failure or myocardial infarction.心力衰竭或心肌梗死后的专业护理机构转介和医院再入院率。
Am J Med. 2012 Jan;125(1):100.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.06.011.
7
Nursing home care quality: insights from a Bayesian network approach.养老院护理质量:贝叶斯网络方法的见解
Gerontologist. 2008 Jun;48(3):338-48. doi: 10.1093/geront/48.3.338.
8
A systems framework for evaluating nursing care quality in nursing homes.一种用于评估养老院护理质量的系统框架。
J Med Syst. 2004 Apr;28(2):197-214. doi: 10.1023/b:joms.0000023302.80118.74.
9
Nursing homes as complex adaptive systems: relationship between management practice and resident outcomes.作为复杂适应系统的养老院:管理实践与居民 outcomes 之间的关系。 (这里“outcomes”结合语境推测可能是指居民相关结果等,但仅根据所给英文准确翻译如此,可能需结合更多背景信息明确其确切含义)
Nurs Res. 2003 Jan-Feb;52(1):12-21. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200301000-00003.
10
Identification and evaluation of existing nursing homes quality indicators.现有养老院质量指标的识别与评估。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2002 Summer;23(4):19-36.