Langius A, Björvell H
Scand J Caring Sci. 1993;7(1):3-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.1993.tb00154.x.
The paper presents reference values of the questionnaires Sense of Coherence scale (SOC), measuring self-rated prerequisite for coping ability, and Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), measuring self-rated functional status. The sample used is randomly selected from a Swedish urban population consisting of 145 individuals (75 women, 70 men), divided into three age groups, 26-40, 41-55 and 56-70 years. The mean SOC score was 151 (SD 18) and was not related to gender or age. The total SIP score was low (median 0) as expected in a general population. However, again as expected, the results revealed the functional status being worse in the older group of individuals than in the younger ones. The results might give further validity to the test. The SOC scores were significantly correlated to the overall SIP scores and to the subscales of mental and social character and not to those of a physical nature. Thus, the weaker the SOC the worse the functional status. These findings are suggested to give the Sense of Coherence scale a discriminating validity. A single item concerning general health was also rated by the individuals showing the better the general health the stronger the SOC and the less the dysfunction.
该论文呈现了连贯感量表(SOC)问卷的参考值,该量表用于测量应对能力的自评前提条件,以及疾病影响概况(SIP)问卷的参考值,该问卷用于测量自评功能状态。所使用的样本是从瑞典城市人口中随机选取的145人(75名女性,70名男性),分为三个年龄组,26 - 40岁、41 - 55岁和56 - 70岁。SOC的平均得分是151(标准差18),与性别或年龄无关。如在普通人群中所预期的那样,SIP的总得分较低(中位数为0)。然而,同样如预期的那样,结果显示年龄较大的个体组的功能状态比年龄较小的个体组更差。这些结果可能会进一步验证该测试的有效性。SOC得分与SIP的总体得分以及心理和社会特征的子量表显著相关,而与身体性质的子量表无关。因此,SOC越弱,功能状态越差。这些发现表明连贯感量表具有区分效度。关于总体健康状况的一个单项也由个体进行了评分,结果显示总体健康状况越好,SOC越强,功能障碍越少。