Nishioka K, Hatano A, Saito C, Kiguchi M, Maeta M, Masuda Y, Ohsaki K, Aoyama H
Department of Otolaryngology, Hiroshima City Hospital.
Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho. 1993 Apr;96(4):617-25.
We report the results of studies on responses to questions on hearing impairment, comparing 165 school children whose hearing was diagnosed as normal at the time of admission to primary school and 37 children with hearing loss attending facilities for children with this disability. These children had been covered by similar surveys as part of the health screening for 1-year-6-month-old infants conducted by municipal authorities. Significant differences between the two groups were noted in the response rates to all questions on hearing. Similar differences were noted in the responses to questions on family history of hearing impairment. There were no significant differences in the incidences of asphyxia and jaundice at birth. The most striking differences were noted in the response rates to questions 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 16, and 18. Most useful and universally valid in this survey were questions 8, 10 and 18 in addition to the question on whether or not parents suspected infantile hearing loss.
我们报告了关于听力障碍问题回答情况的研究结果,比较了165名在小学入学时听力被诊断为正常的学龄儿童和37名在残疾儿童机构就读的听力损失儿童。这些儿童作为市政府对1岁6个月婴儿进行健康筛查的一部分,接受了类似的调查。两组在所有听力问题的回答率上存在显著差异。在听力障碍家族史问题的回答上也发现了类似差异。出生时窒息和黄疸的发生率没有显著差异。在问题6、7、8、10、11、16和18的回答率上发现了最显著的差异。除了关于父母是否怀疑婴儿听力损失的问题外,本次调查中最有用且普遍有效的问题是8、10和18。