Suppr超能文献

[通过问卷筛查听力障碍儿童的研究。2. 使用健康筛查问卷对1岁6个月听力正常和听力损失儿童对各个问题的回答率进行比较]

[Studies on screening for hard-of-hearing children by questionnaire. 2. Comparison of response rates to individual questions in 1-year-6-month-old children with normal hearing and hearing loss using a health screening questionnaire].

作者信息

Nishioka K, Hatano A, Saito C, Kiguchi M, Maeta M, Masuda Y, Ohsaki K, Aoyama H

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Hiroshima City Hospital.

出版信息

Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho. 1993 Apr;96(4):617-25.

PMID:8509934
Abstract

We report the results of studies on responses to questions on hearing impairment, comparing 165 school children whose hearing was diagnosed as normal at the time of admission to primary school and 37 children with hearing loss attending facilities for children with this disability. These children had been covered by similar surveys as part of the health screening for 1-year-6-month-old infants conducted by municipal authorities. Significant differences between the two groups were noted in the response rates to all questions on hearing. Similar differences were noted in the responses to questions on family history of hearing impairment. There were no significant differences in the incidences of asphyxia and jaundice at birth. The most striking differences were noted in the response rates to questions 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 16, and 18. Most useful and universally valid in this survey were questions 8, 10 and 18 in addition to the question on whether or not parents suspected infantile hearing loss.

摘要

我们报告了关于听力障碍问题回答情况的研究结果,比较了165名在小学入学时听力被诊断为正常的学龄儿童和37名在残疾儿童机构就读的听力损失儿童。这些儿童作为市政府对1岁6个月婴儿进行健康筛查的一部分,接受了类似的调查。两组在所有听力问题的回答率上存在显著差异。在听力障碍家族史问题的回答上也发现了类似差异。出生时窒息和黄疸的发生率没有显著差异。在问题6、7、8、10、11、16和18的回答率上发现了最显著的差异。除了关于父母是否怀疑婴儿听力损失的问题外,本次调查中最有用且普遍有效的问题是8、10和18。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验