Mahmoudi A, Iseman M D
University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver.
JAMA. 1993 Jul 7;270(1):65-8.
To determine, among a group of patients with multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis, whether there had been management practices that deviated from established guidelines, and whether these decisions were associated with the acquisition of multidrug resistance and adverse medical sequelae.
Case series.
Referral center.
All patients with pulmonary tuberculosis admitted to the National Jewish Center for Immunology and Respiratory Medicine in 1989 through 1990.
The records of all patients referred to this institution for the treatment of tuberculosis in 1989 through 1990 were reviewed to ascertain the nature of management decisions that might have been associated with the acquisition of drug resistance.
Standards of practice as defined by the American Thoracic Society, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the American College of Chest Physicians were compared with these management decisions to determine whether "errors" had been made, resulting in treatment failure and the development of acquired drug resistance.
Among the 35 study patients, errors were detected in the management decisions in 28; there was an average of 3.93 errors per patient. The most common errors were the addition of a single drug to a failing regimen, failure to identify preexisting or acquired drug resistance, initiation of an inadequate primary regimen, failure to identify and address noncompliance, and inappropriate isoniazid preventive therapy. The multidrug resistance acquired through the errors resulted in prolonged hospitalizations, treatment with more toxic drugs, and high-risk resectional surgery. The costs for this "salvage therapy" were extraordinary, averaging $180,000 per patient.
Aggressive professional education, tighter control on the provisions of care for tuberculosis patients, and the committing of additional resources to tuberculosis control programs are vital in improving the care of tuberculosis patients and limiting the development of acquired drug resistance.
在一组耐多药肺结核患者中,确定是否存在偏离既定指南的管理措施,以及这些决策是否与耐多药的获得及不良医学后果相关。
病例系列研究。
转诊中心。
1989年至1990年入住美国国立犹太免疫与呼吸医学中心的所有肺结核患者。
回顾1989年至1990年转诊至该机构接受结核病治疗的所有患者的记录,以确定可能与耐药获得相关的管理决策的性质。
将美国胸科学会、疾病控制与预防中心及美国胸科医师学会定义的实践标准与这些管理决策进行比较,以确定是否存在导致治疗失败和获得性耐药发生的“错误”。
在35例研究患者中,28例的管理决策中检测到错误;每位患者平均有3.93个错误。最常见的错误包括在治疗失败的方案中添加单一药物、未能识别先前存在或获得的耐药性、初始治疗方案不足、未能识别和解决不依从问题以及不适当的异烟肼预防性治疗。因这些错误获得的耐多药导致住院时间延长、使用毒性更大的药物进行治疗以及高风险的切除手术。这种“挽救治疗”的费用极高,每位患者平均为18万美元。
积极开展专业教育、加强对肺结核患者护理的控制以及为结核病控制项目投入更多资源,对于改善肺结核患者的护理及限制获得性耐药的发展至关重要。