• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氨氯地平与依那普利治疗单纯收缩期高血压的比较。

A comparison of amlodipine with enalapril in the treatment of isolated systolic hypertension.

作者信息

Webster J, Fowler G, Jeffers T A, Lyons D, Witte K, Crichton W A, Wickham E A, Sanghera S S, Cornish R, Petrie J C

机构信息

Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1993 May;35(5):499-505. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1993.tb04176.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2125.1993.tb04176.x
PMID:8512762
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1381688/
Abstract
  1. The safety and efficacy of amlodipine and enalapril were compared in patients with isolated systolic hypertension (supine DBP < 95 mm Hg and supine SBP 160-200 mm Hg). 2. After 2 weeks treatment with placebo 31 patients were randomised by the technique of minimisation in an observer-blind study to receive once daily treatment with either amlodipine (16 patients) or enalapril (15 patients) for 8 weeks. The study design concluded with 2 weeks placebo treatment. In addition to clinic measurements, home blood pressure monitoring (Copal UA-251) was performed during the study. 3. Mean supine systolic blood pressure was reduced from 185 to 164 mm Hg (amlodipine) and 183 to 159 mm Hg (enalapril) (95% CI for the difference between the drugs -10.5, 15.3) after 8 weeks treatment. 4. Mean supine diastolic blood pressure was reduced from 86 to 80 mm Hg (amlodipine) and 88 to 80 mm Hg (enalapril) (95% CI for the difference between the drugs -4.9, 7.6) after 8 weeks treatment. 5. Home blood pressure recordings confirmed these reductions in blood pressure, although there was no significant difference between treatments for the reductions in blood pressure. 6. Both drugs were reasonably well tolerated. The adverse events occurring most frequently in the amlodipine group were headache (2), peripheral oedema (5) and palpitations (2). The adverse events occurring most frequently in the enalapril group were headache (2), peripheral oedema (2), palpitations (2) and dizziness (3).
摘要
  1. 对单纯收缩期高血压患者(仰卧位舒张压<95mmHg且仰卧位收缩压160 - 200mmHg)比较了氨氯地平和依那普利的安全性及疗效。2. 31例患者在接受2周安慰剂治疗后,在一项观察者盲法研究中采用最小化技术随机分组,接受氨氯地平(16例患者)或依那普利(15例患者)每日一次治疗,为期8周。研究设计以2周安慰剂治疗结束。研究期间除了进行临床测量外,还进行了家庭血压监测(Copal UA - 251)。3. 治疗8周后,仰卧位平均收缩压从185mmHg降至164mmHg(氨氯地平组)和从183mmHg降至159mmHg(依那普利组)(两种药物差异的95%置信区间为-10.5,15.3)。4. 治疗8周后,仰卧位平均舒张压从86mmHg降至80mmHg(氨氯地平组)和从88mmHg降至80mmHg(依那普利组)(两种药物差异的95%置信区间为-4.9,7.6)。5. 家庭血压记录证实了血压的这些降低,尽管在血压降低方面治疗之间无显著差异。6. 两种药物耐受性均较好。氨氯地平组最常出现的不良事件为头痛(2例)、外周水肿(5例)和心悸(2例)。依那普利组最常出现的不良事件为头痛(2例)、外周水肿(2例)、心悸(2例)和头晕(3例)。

相似文献

1
A comparison of amlodipine with enalapril in the treatment of isolated systolic hypertension.氨氯地平与依那普利治疗单纯收缩期高血压的比较。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1993 May;35(5):499-505. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1993.tb04176.x.
2
A comparison of amlodipine with enalapril in the treatment of moderate/severe hypertension.氨氯地平与依那普利治疗中/重度高血压的比较。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1993 May;35(5):491-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1993.tb04175.x.
3
Efficacy and safety of 24 weeks of therapy with bendroflumethiazide 1.25 mg/day or 2.5 mg/day and potassium chloride compared with enalapril 10 mg/day and amlodipine 5 mg/day in patients with mild to moderate primary hypertension : a multicentre, randomised, open study.
Clin Drug Investig. 2006;26(2):91-101. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200626020-00004.
4
Low-dose combination treatment for hypertension versus single-drug treatment-bisoprolol/hydrochlorothiazide versus amlodipine, enalapril, and placebo: combined analysis of comparative studies.低剂量联合治疗高血压与单药治疗——比索洛尔/氢氯噻嗪与氨氯地平、依那普利及安慰剂的对比:比较研究的综合分析
Am J Ther. 1998 Sep;5(5):313-21. doi: 10.1097/00045391-199809000-00007.
5
Manidipine versus enalapril monotherapy in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 24-week study.马尼地平与依那普利单药治疗高血压合并2型糖尿病患者的多中心、随机、双盲、24周研究。
Clin Ther. 2005 Feb;27(2):166-73. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.02.001.
6
A double-blind comparison of amlodipine and placebo added to open enalapril in patients with moderate to severe essential hypertension.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1991;17 Suppl 1:S16-8. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199117001-00006.
7
Double-blind, parallel, comparative study on quality of life during treatment with amlodipine or enalapril in mild or moderate hypertensive patients: a multicentre study.
J Hypertens. 1993 Jan;11(1):103-13. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199301000-00015.
8
Randomized, controlled, parallel-group comparison of ambulatory and clinic blood pressure responses to amlodipine or enalapril during and after treatment in adult chinese patients with hypertension.成年中国高血压患者治疗期间及治疗后氨氯地平或依那普利对动态血压和诊室血压反应的随机、对照、平行组比较
Clin Ther. 2004 Aug;26(8):1292-304. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(04)80145-0.
9
[The comparison of hypotensive efficiency and tolerability of amlodipine and enalapril in patients with essential hypertension].
Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2001 Feb;105(2):109-15.
10
Comparison of efficacy and tolerability of amlodipine orotate versus amlodipine besylate in adult patients with mild to moderate hypertension: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 8-week follow-up, noninferiority trial.氨氯地平枸橼酸盐与苯磺酸氨氯地平在轻至中度高血压成年患者中的疗效和耐受性比较:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组、8周随访的非劣效性试验。
Clin Ther. 2006 Apr;28(4):537-51. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.04.008.

引用本文的文献

1
Antihypertensive efficacy and safety of manidipine versus amlodipine in elderly subjects with isolated systolic hypertension: MAISH study.马尼地平与氨氯地平治疗老年单纯收缩期高血压的降压疗效及安全性:MAISH研究
Clin Drug Investig. 2007;27(9):623-32. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200727090-00004.
2
Optimal dosage of ACE inhibitors in older patients.老年患者中血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的最佳剂量
Drugs Aging. 1996 Oct;9(4):262-73. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199609040-00004.
3
Management of isolated systolic hypertension.单纯收缩期高血压的管理
Drugs. 1996 May;51(5):738-49. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199651050-00003.
4
ACE inhibitors. Differential use in elderly patients with hypertension.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂。老年高血压患者的差异使用情况。
Drugs Aging. 1995 Nov;7(5):355-71. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199507050-00004.

本文引用的文献

1
Systolic blood pressure, arterial rigidity, and risk of stroke. The Framingham study.收缩压、动脉僵硬度与中风风险。弗明汉姆研究。
JAMA. 1981 Mar 27;245(12):1225-9.
2
Systemic and arterial hemodynamic effects of nifedipine (20 mg) in mild-to-moderate hypertension.硝苯地平(20毫克)对轻至中度高血压患者的全身及动脉血流动力学影响
Hypertension. 1983 Nov-Dec;5(6 Pt 3):V57-60. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.5.6_pt_3.v57.
3
The effect of external Ca2+ concentration on the contractility of bovine mesenteric lymphatics.细胞外钙离子浓度对牛肠系膜淋巴管收缩性的影响。
Microvasc Res. 1983 Sep;26(2):182-92. doi: 10.1016/0026-2862(83)90069-9.
4
Comparison of ambulatory blood pressure and cardiovascular reflexes in elderly hypertensives, elderly normotensives and young hypertensives.
J Hypertens Suppl. 1983 Dec;1(2):71-3.
5
Comparison of oral MK 421 and propranolol in mild to moderate essential hypertension and their effects on arterial and venous vessels of the forearm.口服MK 421与普萘洛尔治疗轻至中度原发性高血压的比较及其对前臂动静脉血管的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 1984 Mar 1;53(6):781-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(84)90403-x.
6
Minimization: a new method of assigning patients to treatment and control groups.最小化法:一种将患者分配到治疗组和对照组的新方法。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1974 May;15(5):443-53. doi: 10.1002/cpt1974155443.
7
Isolated systolic hypertension in 14 communities.
Am J Epidemiol. 1985 Mar;121(3):362-70. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114007.
8
Evaluation of aortic wall distensibility by aortic pressure-dimension relation: effects of nifedipine on aortic wall.通过主动脉压力-直径关系评估主动脉壁的扩张性:硝苯地平对主动脉壁的影响
Cardiovasc Res. 1987 Apr;21(4):305-12. doi: 10.1093/cvr/21.4.305.
9
Effects of chronic inhibition of converting enzyme on mechanical and structural properties of arteries in rat renovascular hypertension.慢性抑制转化酶对大鼠肾血管性高血压动脉力学和结构特性的影响。
Circ Res. 1988 Jul;63(1):227-39. doi: 10.1161/01.res.63.1.227.
10
Determinants of isolated systolic hypertension.
JAMA. 1988 Dec 16;260(23):3451-5.