Suppr超能文献

氨氯地平与依那普利治疗单纯收缩期高血压的比较。

A comparison of amlodipine with enalapril in the treatment of isolated systolic hypertension.

作者信息

Webster J, Fowler G, Jeffers T A, Lyons D, Witte K, Crichton W A, Wickham E A, Sanghera S S, Cornish R, Petrie J C

机构信息

Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1993 May;35(5):499-505. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1993.tb04176.x.

Abstract
  1. The safety and efficacy of amlodipine and enalapril were compared in patients with isolated systolic hypertension (supine DBP < 95 mm Hg and supine SBP 160-200 mm Hg). 2. After 2 weeks treatment with placebo 31 patients were randomised by the technique of minimisation in an observer-blind study to receive once daily treatment with either amlodipine (16 patients) or enalapril (15 patients) for 8 weeks. The study design concluded with 2 weeks placebo treatment. In addition to clinic measurements, home blood pressure monitoring (Copal UA-251) was performed during the study. 3. Mean supine systolic blood pressure was reduced from 185 to 164 mm Hg (amlodipine) and 183 to 159 mm Hg (enalapril) (95% CI for the difference between the drugs -10.5, 15.3) after 8 weeks treatment. 4. Mean supine diastolic blood pressure was reduced from 86 to 80 mm Hg (amlodipine) and 88 to 80 mm Hg (enalapril) (95% CI for the difference between the drugs -4.9, 7.6) after 8 weeks treatment. 5. Home blood pressure recordings confirmed these reductions in blood pressure, although there was no significant difference between treatments for the reductions in blood pressure. 6. Both drugs were reasonably well tolerated. The adverse events occurring most frequently in the amlodipine group were headache (2), peripheral oedema (5) and palpitations (2). The adverse events occurring most frequently in the enalapril group were headache (2), peripheral oedema (2), palpitations (2) and dizziness (3).
摘要
  1. 对单纯收缩期高血压患者(仰卧位舒张压<95mmHg且仰卧位收缩压160 - 200mmHg)比较了氨氯地平和依那普利的安全性及疗效。2. 31例患者在接受2周安慰剂治疗后,在一项观察者盲法研究中采用最小化技术随机分组,接受氨氯地平(16例患者)或依那普利(15例患者)每日一次治疗,为期8周。研究设计以2周安慰剂治疗结束。研究期间除了进行临床测量外,还进行了家庭血压监测(Copal UA - 251)。3. 治疗8周后,仰卧位平均收缩压从185mmHg降至164mmHg(氨氯地平组)和从183mmHg降至159mmHg(依那普利组)(两种药物差异的95%置信区间为-10.5,15.3)。4. 治疗8周后,仰卧位平均舒张压从86mmHg降至80mmHg(氨氯地平组)和从88mmHg降至80mmHg(依那普利组)(两种药物差异的95%置信区间为-4.9,7.6)。5. 家庭血压记录证实了血压的这些降低,尽管在血压降低方面治疗之间无显著差异。6. 两种药物耐受性均较好。氨氯地平组最常出现的不良事件为头痛(2例)、外周水肿(5例)和心悸(2例)。依那普利组最常出现的不良事件为头痛(2例)、外周水肿(2例)、心悸(2例)和头晕(3例)。

相似文献

2
A comparison of amlodipine with enalapril in the treatment of moderate/severe hypertension.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1993 May;35(5):491-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1993.tb04175.x.

本文引用的文献

7
Isolated systolic hypertension in 14 communities.
Am J Epidemiol. 1985 Mar;121(3):362-70. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114007.
10
Determinants of isolated systolic hypertension.
JAMA. 1988 Dec 16;260(23):3451-5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验