• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A comparison of amlodipine with enalapril in the treatment of moderate/severe hypertension.氨氯地平与依那普利治疗中/重度高血压的比较。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1993 May;35(5):491-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1993.tb04175.x.
2
A comparison of amlodipine with enalapril in the treatment of isolated systolic hypertension.氨氯地平与依那普利治疗单纯收缩期高血压的比较。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1993 May;35(5):499-505. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1993.tb04176.x.
3
Efficacy and safety of 24 weeks of therapy with bendroflumethiazide 1.25 mg/day or 2.5 mg/day and potassium chloride compared with enalapril 10 mg/day and amlodipine 5 mg/day in patients with mild to moderate primary hypertension : a multicentre, randomised, open study.
Clin Drug Investig. 2006;26(2):91-101. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200626020-00004.
4
A double-blind comparison of amlodipine and placebo added to open enalapril in patients with moderate to severe essential hypertension.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1991;17 Suppl 1:S16-8. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199117001-00006.
5
Comparison of efficacy and tolerability of amlodipine orotate versus amlodipine besylate in adult patients with mild to moderate hypertension: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 8-week follow-up, noninferiority trial.氨氯地平枸橼酸盐与苯磺酸氨氯地平在轻至中度高血压成年患者中的疗效和耐受性比较:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组、8周随访的非劣效性试验。
Clin Ther. 2006 Apr;28(4):537-51. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.04.008.
6
Manidipine versus enalapril monotherapy in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 24-week study.马尼地平与依那普利单药治疗高血压合并2型糖尿病患者的多中心、随机、双盲、24周研究。
Clin Ther. 2005 Feb;27(2):166-73. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.02.001.
7
Double-blind, parallel, comparative study on quality of life during treatment with amlodipine or enalapril in mild or moderate hypertensive patients: a multicentre study.
J Hypertens. 1993 Jan;11(1):103-13. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199301000-00015.
8
Low-dose combination treatment for hypertension versus single-drug treatment-bisoprolol/hydrochlorothiazide versus amlodipine, enalapril, and placebo: combined analysis of comparative studies.低剂量联合治疗高血压与单药治疗——比索洛尔/氢氯噻嗪与氨氯地平、依那普利及安慰剂的对比:比较研究的综合分析
Am J Ther. 1998 Sep;5(5):313-21. doi: 10.1097/00045391-199809000-00007.
9
[The comparison of hypotensive efficiency and tolerability of amlodipine and enalapril in patients with essential hypertension].
Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2001 Feb;105(2):109-15.
10
Effect of antihypertensive agents on cardiovascular events in patients with coronary disease and normal blood pressure: the CAMELOT study: a randomized controlled trial.抗高血压药物对冠心病且血压正常患者心血管事件的影响:CAMELOT研究:一项随机对照试验
JAMA. 2004 Nov 10;292(18):2217-25. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.18.2217.

引用本文的文献

1
Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for determination of amlodipine in plasma.
J Clin Lab Anal. 2001;15(1):47-53. doi: 10.1002/1098-2825(2001)15:1<47::aid-jcla10>3.0.co;2-7.

本文引用的文献

1
The efficacy and safety of amlodipine in the treatment of mild and moderate essential hypertension in general practice.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1991;17 Suppl 1:S30-3. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199117001-00011.
2
An open, parallel, comparative evaluation of amlodipine and nitrendipine in the monotherapeutic treatment of mild and moderate essential hypertension.氨氯地平和尼群地平单药治疗轻度和中度原发性高血压的开放性、平行、对照评估
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1991;17 Suppl 1:S22-4.
3
Minimization: a new method of assigning patients to treatment and control groups.最小化法:一种将患者分配到治疗组和对照组的新方法。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1974 May;15(5):443-53. doi: 10.1002/cpt1974155443.
4
Treated blood pressure, rather than pretreatment, predicts survival in hypertensive patients. A report from the DHSS Hypertension Care Computing Project (DHCCP).
J Hypertens. 1988 Aug;6(8):627-32. doi: 10.1097/00004872-198808000-00005.
5
Amlodipine and captopril in moderate-severe essential hypertension.氨氯地平和卡托普利治疗中重度原发性高血压
J Hum Hypertens. 1988 Aug;2(2):127-32.
6
Once daily amlodipine in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.氨氯地平每日一次治疗轻至中度高血压。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1987 Dec;24(6):713-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1987.tb03236.x.
7
A comparison of amlodipine, verapamil and placebo in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension. Amlodipine Study Group.
J Hum Hypertens. 1989 Jun;3(3):191-6.
8
24 h blood pressure control with the once daily calcium antagonist, amlodipine.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1989 Mar;27(3):359-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1989.tb05377.x.
9
A dose-response study of amlodipine in mild to moderate hypertension.
J Intern Med. 1989 Feb;225(2):101-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1989.tb00047.x.
10
Double-blind comparison of amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1988;12 Suppl 7:S98-102. doi: 10.1097/00005344-198812007-00022.

氨氯地平与依那普利治疗中/重度高血压的比较。

A comparison of amlodipine with enalapril in the treatment of moderate/severe hypertension.

作者信息

Fowler G, Webster J, Lyons D, Witte K, Crichton W A, Jeffers T A, Wickham E A, Sanghera S S, Cornish R, Petrie J C

机构信息

Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1993 May;35(5):491-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1993.tb04175.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2125.1993.tb04175.x
PMID:8512761
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1381687/
Abstract
  1. The safety and efficacy of amlodipine vs enalapril as monotherapy was evaluated in patients with moderate/severe hypertension (supine DBP 105-125 mm Hg, SBP 140-220 mm Hg). 2. After 2 weeks placebo treatment 31 patients were randomised by the technique of minimisation in an observer-blind study to receive once daily treatment with either amlodipine (15 patients) 5-10 mg, or enalapril (16 patients) 5-20 mg for 8 weeks. The study design concluded with 2 weeks placebo treatment. In addition to clinic measurements, home blood pressure monitoring (Copal UA-251) was performed during the study. 3. Clinic supine systolic blood pressure was reduced from 177 to 152 mm Hg (amlodipine) and 183 to 169 mm Hg (enalapril) (95% CI for the intergroup difference -22.1, 0.3, P = 0.06) after 8 weeks treatment. 4. Clinic supine diastolic blood pressure was reduced from 110 to 93 mm Hg (amlodipine) and 109-102 mm Hg (enalapril) (95% CI for the intergroup difference -17.7, -2.7, P < 0.01) after 8 weeks treatment. 5. Home blood pressure recordings confirmed these reductions in blood pressure. Although the reduction in blood pressure was greater for the amlodipine treated group, the differences between treatments were not statistically significant. 6. Both drugs were reasonably well tolerated. The adverse events occurring most frequently in the amlodipine group were headache (5), peripheral oedema (3), upper respiratory infection (3) and anxiety (2). The adverse events occurring most frequently in the enalapril treated patients were headache (6), dizziness (3) and upper respiratory infection (2).
摘要
  1. 对中度/重度高血压患者(仰卧位舒张压105 - 125mmHg,收缩压140 - 220mmHg)评估了氨氯地平与依那普利单药治疗的安全性和有效性。2. 经过2周安慰剂治疗后,在一项观察者盲法研究中,采用最小化技术将31例患者随机分组,接受为期8周的每日一次治疗,其中15例患者服用5 - 10mg氨氯地平,16例患者服用5 - 20mg依那普利。研究设计以2周安慰剂治疗结束。研究期间除了进行门诊测量外,还进行了家庭血压监测(Copal UA - 251)。3. 治疗8周后,门诊仰卧位收缩压从177mmHg降至152mmHg(氨氯地平组)和从183mmHg降至169mmHg(依那普利组)(组间差异的95%置信区间为 - 22.1, 0.3,P = 0.06)。4. 治疗8周后,门诊仰卧位舒张压从110mmHg降至93mmHg(氨氯地平组)和从109mmHg降至102mmHg(依那普利组)(组间差异的95%置信区间为 - 17.7, - 2.7,P < 0.01)。5. 家庭血压记录证实了血压的这些降低。虽然氨氯地平治疗组的血压降低幅度更大,但治疗组之间的差异无统计学意义。6. 两种药物耐受性均较好。氨氯地平组最常出现的不良事件为头痛(5例)、外周水肿(3例)、上呼吸道感染(3例)和焦虑(2例)。依那普利治疗患者最常出现的不良事件为头痛(6例)、头晕(3例)和上呼吸道感染(2例)。