Is there really a conceptual difference in choosing the cutpoint for dichotomizing outcome and predictor variables?
作者信息
Wartenberg D, Northridge M, Rhoads G G
出版信息
Epidemiology. 1993 May;4(3):274-5; author reply 276.
PMID:8512994
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Is there really a conceptual difference in choosing the cutpoint for dichotomizing outcome and predictor variables?在对结果变量和预测变量进行二分法划分时选择切点，真的存在概念上的差异吗？
Epidemiology. 1993 May;4(3):274-5; author reply 276.
2
Is there really a conceptual difference in choosing the cutpoint for dichotomizing outcome and predictor variables?
Epidemiology. 1993 May;4(3):274; author reply 276. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199305000-00013.
3
Dichotomizing continuous outcome variables: dependence of the magnitude of association and statistical power on the cutpoint.二分连续结果变量：关联强度和统计功效对切点的依赖性。
Epidemiology. 1992 Sep;3(5):434-40. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199209000-00009.
4
Reconciling theory and practice regarding p values.
Epidemiology. 2013 Sep;24(5):781-2. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31829f39d9.
5
Reconciling theory and practice regarding p values.
Epidemiology. 2013 Sep;24(5):781. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31829ef32e.
6
Commentary: reconciling theory and practice: what is to be done with p values?评论：调和理论与实践：如何处理P值？
Epidemiology. 2013 Mar;24(2):212-4. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318281e856.
7
On the probability of gallstone recurrence.关于胆结石复发的概率。
J Hepatol. 1987 Jun;4(3):390-2. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(87)80550-0.
8
Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in 'meta-epidemiological' research.在“元流行病学”研究中评估研究特征对治疗效果影响的统计方法。
Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1513-24. doi: 10.1002/sim.1184.
9
Re: "Statistical reasoning in epidemiology".关于：“流行病学中的统计推理”。
Am J Epidemiol. 1992 May 15;135(10):1186-7. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116223.
10
The dangers of correlation of mean alcohol consumption with other variables over time.随着时间推移，平均酒精消费量与其他变量之间的相关性所带来的风险。
Alcohol Alcohol. 1985;20(3):347-9.
Zotero 插件