Suppr超能文献

对体外存活的人内皮细胞非特异性胞饮作用的定量评估。

A quantitative assessment of non specific pinocytosis by human endothelial cells surviving in vitro.

作者信息

Catizone A, Medolago Albani L, Reola F, Alescio T

机构信息

Institute of Histology and General Embryology, University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 1993 Mar;39(2):155-69.

PMID:8513272
Abstract

Human umbilical vein endothelial cells have been assayed in vitro, 24 hrs. after plating, for non specific pinocytic activity. The culture conditions were designed to minimize the exogenous stimulations of pinocytosis, such as those possibly coming from mitotic induction and chemical and contact-dependent signaling. Two different markers were used: Lucifer Yellow CH (LY), and three different preparations of horseradish peroxidase, a multiple form (type II) composed of five different isoenzymes, and two purified acidic (type VIII) and basic (type IX) isoenzymes. The uptake of LY appears to depend on both fluid-phase incorporation and non specific adsorption to the cell surface, and it shows a linear monophasic dependence on time and a linear diphasic dependence on concentration. This probe is actively chased from the cells to an extent proportional to the amount incorporated. Therefore, the endocytic index obtained from the LY incorporation data is not a reliable estimate of extracellular fluid incorporation. The three different forms of HRP share an incorporation pattern linearly dependent on both time and concentration, consistent with the classical interpretation of a simple fluid-phase mechanism of intracellular uptake; however, the rates of uptake and chase activity of the pure isoenzymes are clearly different from that of the multiple form. The observed differences are related to possible local variations in the physicochemical properties of the cell surface, which may restrict the cell surface area suitable for fluid-phase uptake of differently charged macromolecular probes.

摘要

人脐静脉内皮细胞在接种24小时后,已在体外进行了非特异性胞饮活性测定。培养条件的设计旨在尽量减少胞饮作用的外源性刺激,例如那些可能来自有丝分裂诱导以及化学和接触依赖性信号传导的刺激。使用了两种不同的标记物:路西法黄CH(LY),以及三种不同制剂的辣根过氧化物酶,一种由五种不同同工酶组成的多种形式(II型),以及两种纯化的酸性(VIII型)和碱性(IX型)同工酶。LY的摄取似乎既取决于液相掺入,也取决于细胞表面的非特异性吸附,并且它显示出对时间的线性单相依赖性和对浓度的线性双相依赖性。这种探针会在一定程度上与掺入量成比例地从细胞中被主动清除。因此,从LY掺入数据获得的内吞指数并不是细胞外液掺入的可靠估计。三种不同形式的HRP具有与时间和浓度均呈线性相关的掺入模式,这与细胞内摄取的简单液相机制的经典解释一致;然而,纯同工酶的摄取和清除活性速率明显不同于多种形式的HRP。观察到的差异与细胞表面物理化学性质可能存在的局部变化有关,这可能会限制适合不同电荷大分子探针进行液相摄取的细胞表面积。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验