• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Middle term evaluation of amlodipine vs nitrendipine: efficacy, safety and metabolic effects in elderly hypertensive patients.

作者信息

Grandinetti O, Feraco E

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, I.N.R.C.A.-Institute for Geriatric Cardiovascular Diseases, Cosenza, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Exp Hypertens. 1993;15 Suppl 1:197-210.

PMID:8513310
Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate, in a population of elderly hypertensives, the efficacy for 24 hours, the safety and the effects on carbohydrates and lipids metabolism of amlodipine (A) and nitrendipine (N). After a 3-week placebo wash-out, 50 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension (HBP) or isolated systolic hypertension (ISH), were randomized in 4 groups treated with once-daily A 5,10mg or N 10,20mg increasing until patients responded to treatment. All subjects were submitted to a 24-hour non invasive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) at the start of the study (t0) and after four weeks of therapy (t4). It was registered a mean daily reduction in the pressure load of 15.0% in group A, 14.1% in group B, 13.9% in group C and 15.6% in group D; (p < 0.001). 82% of the patients treated with A and 85% treated with N resulted "responder". The metabolic parameters considered showed no significant changes. The overall incidence of adverse effects were temporary and extremely limited (2%). As monotherapies, amlodipine and nitrendipine are both suitable for the management of mild to moderate hypertension in elderly.

摘要

相似文献

1
Middle term evaluation of amlodipine vs nitrendipine: efficacy, safety and metabolic effects in elderly hypertensive patients.
Clin Exp Hypertens. 1993;15 Suppl 1:197-210.
2
Parallel comparative trial of amlodipine and nitrendipine monotherapy in patients with essential hypertension.氨氯地平和尼群地平单药治疗原发性高血压患者的平行对照试验
J Hypertens Suppl. 1998 Sep;16(4):S43-7.
3
An open, parallel, comparative evaluation of amlodipine and nitrendipine in the monotherapeutic treatment of mild and moderate essential hypertension.氨氯地平和尼群地平单药治疗轻度和中度原发性高血压的开放性、平行、对照评估
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1991;17 Suppl 1:S22-4.
4
Treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension with calcium channel blockers: a multicentre comparison of once-daily nifedipine GITS with once-daily amlodipine.钙通道阻滞剂治疗轻至中度高血压:一日一次硝苯地平控释片与一日一次氨氯地平的多中心比较
Curr Med Res Opin. 2003;19(3):226-37. doi: 10.1185/030079903125001677.
5
Two multicenter, 8-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of amlodipine and valsartan in combination and as monotherapy in adult patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.两项多中心、为期8周、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组研究,评估氨氯地平和缬沙坦联合用药及单药治疗对轻度至中度原发性高血压成年患者的疗效和耐受性。
Clin Ther. 2007 Apr;29(4):563-80. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.03.018.
6
Comparison of amlodipine and captopril in hypertension based on 24-hour ambulatory monitoring.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1993;22 Suppl A:S20-3.
7
Ambulatory versus clinic blood pressure for the assessment of anti hypertensive efficacy in clinical trials: insights from the Val-Syst Study.动态血压与诊室血压用于评估临床试验中抗高血压疗效:来自Val-Syst研究的见解
Clin Ther. 2004 Sep;26(9):1436-45. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.09.003.
8
Differential time effect profiles of amlodipine, as compared to valsartan, revealed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, self blood pressure measurements and dose omission protocol.通过动态血压监测、自我血压测量和剂量省略方案揭示的氨氯地平与缬沙坦相比的不同时间效应曲线。
Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Aug;18(4):483-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2004.00269.x.
9
Efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy with valsartan plus hydrochlorothiazide compared with amlodipine monotherapy in hypertensive patients with other cardiovascular risk factors: the VAST study.缬沙坦联合氢氯噻嗪与氨氯地平单药治疗对伴有其他心血管危险因素的高血压患者的疗效及耐受性比较:VAST研究
Clin Ther. 2005 May;27(5):578-87. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.05.006.
10
Results of a phase III, 8-week, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial to assess the effects of amlodipine camsylate versus amlodipine besylate in Korean adults with mild to moderate hypertension.一项三期、为期8周、多中心、前瞻性、随机、双盲、平行组临床试验的结果,该试验旨在评估坎地沙坦酯与苯磺酸氨氯地平对韩国轻至中度高血压成年人的疗效。
Clin Ther. 2007 Sep;29(9):1924-36. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.09.018.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of isolated systolic hypertension.单纯收缩期高血压的管理
Drugs. 1996 May;51(5):738-49. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199651050-00003.